wengxyu1030 / MIS

This is the repository for MIS, which is consistent with DHS in structure, covered a limited set of indicators that HEFPI is looking for.
1 stars 0 forks source link

SierraLeone2013-JW #49

Closed robin-wang closed 3 years ago

robin-wang commented 3 years ago

WORKFLOW DOC

{FOR REVIEWERS}

{FOR CODERS} A. General Procedural Steps

B. Checklist and Guidance

jianingwwww commented 3 years ago
af3c51a99763e8d921bfbee0efcf2d7

Sierra Leone2013 is not available (the type of data is DHS, not MIS).

robin-wang commented 3 years ago

Hi Jianing, could you please take a look to see if MIS related datasets are in place for SierraLeone2013? Thanks!

jianingwwww commented 3 years ago

Hi Jianing, could you please take a look to see if MIS related datasets are in place for SierraLeone2013? Thanks!

Thank you for the suggestion! SierraLeone2013 DHS also has MIS related datasets (birth/household/household member/children.dta) and I will give a try.

jianingwwww commented 3 years ago

Hi @robin-wang , I have some questions about this survey when I try to match it with public data. I can only find the public data of DHS, not MIS (i.e., SL2013DHS). DHS data can also be matched, of course, but then it will generate lots of missing values in the quality check result, given that the DHS contains 58 variables, whilst the MIS contains only 4 variables. The only way to avoid these missing values is to transform all the codes into DHS codes. But it seems weird in this MIS repository (and time-consuming). So should I make this change? or just leave it and not generate the quality control file?

robin-wang commented 3 years ago

Hi Jianing @jianingwwww Two options, choose the one you feel makes most sense.

  1. Screenshot the public data values, and compare that against our values. this might mean some manual tabulations.
  2. Just go ahead and take the DHS data, disregard the missing variables. Leave a note, and that will do.
jianingwwww commented 3 years ago

I matched the public data with our values manually. This is the quality control result I uploaded to the OneDrive, but it cannot be generated automatically by codes.

21ef3da8d7d0c3cf69e8522bb945548

m14 for c_anc and ml0 for c_ITN tabulated but no problem found.

1b5695bff891c7f3b07f2e82caa6ffd b6807e26ec23bd3f101966007553ed1 81d537eecb176123895fc4c3ee61eac
robin-wang commented 3 years ago

@wengxyu1030 Hey Aline, re anc visits, based on the data we have, it is unlikely that the public data value of 76 could be replicated. Thoughts?

wengxyu1030 commented 3 years ago

Dear @robin-wang and @jianingwwww, thanks for the question.

If there's no MIS however only DHS data, please use the DHS template instead of the MIS template. As the DHS microdata has been generated accordingly, this MIS template-generated microdata would only be a subset of it, which I will delete to avoid confusion.

Talking about the c_anc and c_ITN, comparing to the HEFPI public statistics, it's not flagged. Considering the methodology between DHS and HEFPI is slightly different, we would prioritize the comparison to HEFPI public data but also keep in mind the difference for future references.

image

Regards, Aline

robin-wang commented 3 years ago

Thanks @wengxyu1030 I guess this issue should be closed.

@jianingwwww Hats off to your hard work on the MIS series. No need to upload micro-data. We will share further instructions on the DHS repository if you are open to carrying through with DHS-SierraLeone2013 ?

jianingwwww commented 3 years ago

We will share further instructions on the DHS repository if you are open to carrying through with DHS-SierraLeone2013 ?

@robin-wang Sure, I'd love to start with DHS-SierraLeone2013 in the DHS repository~

robin-wang commented 3 years ago

Okay, thanks! I'll confirm with World Bank team first; if they have done DHS SL2013, then we don't have to reinvent the wheel. Will keep you posted.