Open mfogel opened 7 years ago
Hi @mfogel - the short answer is: Yes!
Visualizing alt geometries has always been on the TODO list (although I can't find an actual issue for it...) but until recently there haven't been enough alt geometries to warrant the time to think about the UI/UX questions, relative to all the other things.
I am not sure that I love the idea of tabs, if only because eventually there won't be enough room above the map to show all the options. Mobile will trigger that scenario almost immediately for a significant number of places.
That said what you're proposing meets the general criteria of "better than yesterday" so I would love you see what you're thinking in a PR. So long as there's nothing that makes rejiggering the UI overy-complicated (when the time comes) this would be a definitely improvement.
Thanks!
@thisisaaronland great!
I'm not nuts about the tabs either. I think it might work better to make the alt geometries available via a map control. Unless you like the tabs better, this is what I'll shoot for in a PR.
I was thinking maybe a select menu – or equivalent – under the map but let's start with what you've got and see how it feels / works.
Spelunker would be more useful to me if it provided a visualization of the alternate geometries of a record (if any exist) along with links directly to the raw geojson files for those alternate geometries.
I'd propose two changes to provide this functionality.
First, a row of tabs above the slippery map:
Second, some more 'raw data' links in the 'Other' section:
Thoughts? If these changes look acceptable I'll set them up in a pull request.