Results single scenario: further plots

[nesnoj]

Post-merge-#27-tasks:

Resolution: ABW (Data in results['results_axlxt'])

4.1 Balance

1. Add balance for entire region, either as subplot in the existing mun-graph to the right (also discussed here) or as new bargraph.
2. Table:

#	Größe	Einheit	Plot/Tabelle	Kommentar	Done?
B1	Full load hours	-	bar	x: technology, y: hours	x

5 Emissions

As we now have more detailed results on emissions #88, please add more plots:

#	Größe	Einheit	Plot/Tabelle	Kommentar	Done?
E1	Emissions Electricity	t CO2-eq	stacked bar	x: technology, y: Fix, Var
E2	Emissions Heat	t CO2-eq	stacked bar	x: technology, y: Fix, Var
E3	Emissions Storages + Transmission	t CO2-eq	stacked bar	x: technology, y: Fix, Var
E4	...	...	...	...

6 Costs

#	Größe	Einheit	Plot/Tabelle	Kommentar	Done?
C1	Generation Electricity (inkl. import)	EUR	stacked bar	x: technology, y: Fix, Var, CO2 certs
C2	Generation Heat	EUR	stacked bar	x: technology, y: Fix, Var, CO2 certs
C3	Generation Storages + Transmission	EUR	stacked bar	x: technology (Grid, Storages el+th), y: Fix, Var
C4	...	...	...	...

8 DSM

#	Größe	Einheit	Plot/Tabelle	Kommentar	Done?
D1	DSM utilization relative to potential	%	bar	x: ags, y: DSM utilization. Potential here refers to flexibilizable demand

More to come...

[nailend]

@nesnoj B1: for the total region or each ags? if for each ags, as a stacked bar? does it make sense?

[nesnoj]

@nesnoj B1: for the total region or each ags? if for each ags, as a stacked bar? does it make sense?

For entire region only. I'd go for bars side-by-side..

[nailend]

• E1 and E2 does already exist in one plot combined, doesnt it? 5. Emissions: a stacked bar each with storage included.
• E3 What do you mean by transmission? the Grid in total? Do you want the emissions of the lines to be stacked?

[nesnoj]

• E1 and E2 does already exist in one plot combined, doesnt it?

Yes it does: one stack per sector but not divided into var+fix. I added a new plot in 5.2 in #126, there you'll see what I mean. Note that the code for el+th is redundant and might be worth to be put in to draw module. (also, I tried a sunburst here in 5.3 which I like, it might be worth to be picked up but with low priority. If we continue on this, grid+stor should be added)

• E3 What do you mean by transmission? the Grid? do you want the emissions of the lines to be stacked? Yepp, emissions caused by existing and new grid. A grand total for each is sufficient.

Overall goal here is to see what causes most emissions: el, th, grid, stor ? (that's why I like the sunburst but there we have a little too many (sub)categories...)

[nesnoj]

Bug in plot 5.1: names for dec pth (e.g. pth_ASHG_nostor) are not replaced by readable ones as done in e.g. 5.2

[nailend]

Bug in plot 5.1: names for dec pth (e.g. pth_ASHG_nostor) are not replaced by readable ones as done in e.g. 5.2

what do you mean by this? the hoverinfo?

[nesnoj]

what do you mean by this? the hoverinfo?

Yes, and the legend.

[nailend]

which scenario?

[nesnoj]

Ok, maybe we're talking about different things. I mean this one:

[nailend]

Maybe updateing PRINT_NAMES in tools.py with the ones from draw.py solves it.

[nesnoj]

Maybe updateing PRINT_NAMES in tools.py with the ones from draw.py solves it.

You gonna do this or shall I?

One more thing: I'd merge 9 (Energy Exchange) into 3 (Autarky) as it is closely related and give it a new headline such as "Energy Exchange and Autarky" or similar. What do you think?

[nailend]

You gonna do this or shall I?

I will include it in the further plots, feature

One more thing: I'd merge 9 (Energy Exchange) into 3 (Autarky) as it is closely related and give it a new headline such as "Energy Exchange and Autarky" or similar. What do you think?

It will then become a quite big chapter. Maybe moving it up would sufficient?

[nesnoj]

It will then become a quite big chapter. Maybe moving it up would sufficient?

Hmm in the end it belongs together. We would only add 2 plots (I'd remove Mr. Sankey although I love this type) to the 5 existing ones, I don't think that's too large. We could add subsections like I did in no 3 of #64. Also, we should reorder some sections..

I've created a new issue for completion of the nb and added these tasks #130.