wycats javascript-decorators issues

wycats / javascript-decorators

2.4k stars 127 forks source link

issues

Newest

Newest Most commented Recently updated Oldest Least commented Least recently updated

Update README.md

#96 abhidtu2014 closed 1 year ago
0
Issue with code

#95 Ganeshdev22 opened 4 years ago
0
Support generics for send<string>(): string

#94 gruckion opened 5 years ago
0
fix miss parameter

#93 supperchong closed 4 years ago
0
Typo in `nonenumerable` function example

#92 dmwelch opened 6 years ago
1
Update README.md

#91 RWOverdijk closed 5 years ago
0
Docs: Fix variable name typo

#90 timwis opened 6 years ago
1
Update README.md

#89 GabrielDelepine closed 6 years ago
1
Fix typo in README

#88 ditkin closed 6 years ago
0
-

#87 pqml closed 6 years ago
0
Fix typo

#86 sea-witch opened 6 years ago
0
Fix typo, description should be "descriptor"

#85 yorkie opened 7 years ago
0
Fix missing param of `Object.defineProperty `

#84 blade254353074 closed 7 years ago
1
syntax error

#83 jituanlin opened 7 years ago
0
Is the decorators proposal dead?

#82 Download closed 6 years ago
5
Method decorated haven't access to the property 'this' of the constructor

#81 wzalazar closed 7 years ago
2
fix typo on README

#80 charlypoly closed 8 years ago
1
access decorated class from itself

#79 mixtur opened 8 years ago
4
Inline Class Decorators

#78 dongryphon opened 8 years ago
3
fix typo

#77 nikolai-katkov opened 8 years ago
0
Fix description parameter in nonenumerable

#76 msarris closed 8 years ago
1
Current State of Decorators

#75 dcwardell7 opened 8 years ago
11
Add missing word

#74 webOS101 opened 8 years ago
0
Fix typo in argument

#73 pgilad closed 8 years ago
2
"this" inside the decorator

#72 mjesun opened 8 years ago
5
Property initializers

#71 fatfisz opened 8 years ago
17
The new SPEC proposal is highly redundant, very limiting and does not even allow for class decoration

#70 silkentrance closed 8 years ago
4
Proposal built-in decorator @decorator

#69 silkentrance closed 8 years ago
1
Reuse original decorator only if not `Type(result) is Object` for methods, etc.

#68 dead-claudia opened 8 years ago
0
Nomenclature

#67 silkentrance opened 8 years ago
0
Specification Proposal

#66 silkentrance closed 8 years ago
6
Proposal: Allow client code to intercept the decoration process

#65 Download opened 8 years ago
35
Error in example?

#64 felixsanz closed 10 months ago
1
Fix typo

#63 stcherenkov closed 6 years ago
1
New decorator proposal

#62 silkentrance closed 8 years ago
7
Avoiding duck type checking

#61 Download closed 8 years ago
17
Private state

#60 silkentrance closed 8 years ago
1
grammar 'the' -> 'this'

#59 morenoh149 closed 1 year ago
0
Fix a few typos

#58 prayagverma opened 8 years ago
0
property descriptor value vs initializer

#57 darul75 closed 8 years ago
5
wondering how to propose a feature, plan to propose coffee style if

#56 zzz6519003 closed 8 years ago
2
Proposed revisions to mirror API

#55 rbuckton closed 6 years ago
0
Fix variable name

#54 jacksonhoose closed 8 years ago
2
Change mismatching "description" to "descriptor"

#53 david0178418 closed 1 year ago
0
Force decorators to be higher-order functions even without parentheses

#52 alexbyk closed 8 years ago
61
Fixed typo

#51 yuezk closed 8 years ago
1
Update README.md - missing noun in line 71

#50 Enet4 opened 8 years ago
0
Fix Typo in code

#49 smy20011 opened 8 years ago
1
different angle on functions decorators: classes should not be decoratable

#48 saurik opened 8 years ago
31
typo, wrong return value or parameter name

#47 fi0rini opened 9 years ago
3