yasuflatland-lf / liferay-dummy-factory

🏭 Liferay DXP / 7 Dummy data generation portlet
MIT License
49 stars 35 forks source link

Adding Dummy Factory to a page throws No tag "upload-progress" defined in tag library imported with prefix "liferay-ui" #49

Closed lipusz closed 1 month ago

lipusz commented 7 months ago

Hi Yasu,

When I'm adding the latest version (7.4.4) of the module to a page on master (liferay-portal@eb99c8776afffd89a16b77f023ba1641e1d852cc ~U112), latest HEAD today) it is generating the following error:

2024-02-13 10:37:13.492 ERROR [http-nio-8080-exec-7][PortletRequestDispatcherImpl:295] Unable to dispatch request: /view.jsp(123,16) PWC6142: No tag "upload-progress" defined in tag library imported with prefix "liferay-ui"
2024-02-13 10:37:13.493 ERROR [http-nio-8080-exec-7][PortletServlet:109] Unable to process portlet com_liferay_support_tools_portlet_LiferayDummyFactoryPortlet: org.apache.jasper.JasperException: /view.jsp(123,16) PWC6142: No tag "upload-progress" defined in tag library imported with prefix "liferay-ui"
javax.portlet.PortletException: org.apache.jasper.JasperException: /view.jsp(123,16) PWC6142: No tag "upload-progress" defined in tag library imported with prefix "liferay-ui"
    at com.liferay.portlet.internal.PortletRequestDispatcherImpl.dispatch(PortletRequestDispatcherImpl.java:298) ~[portal-impl.jar:?]
    at com.liferay.portlet.internal.PortletRequestDispatcherImpl.include(PortletRequestDispatcherImpl.java:114) ~[portal-impl.jar:?]
    at com.liferay.portal.kernel.portlet.bridges.mvc.MVCPortlet.include(MVCPortlet.java:611) ~[portal-kernel.jar:?]
    at com.liferay.portal.kernel.portlet.bridges.mvc.MVCPortlet.include(MVCPortlet.java:627) ~[portal-kernel.jar:?]
    at com.liferay.portal.kernel.portlet.bridges.mvc.MVCPortlet.doView(MVCPortlet.java:172) ~[portal-kernel.jar:?]
    at com.liferay.support.tools.portlet.LiferayDummyFactoryPortlet.doView(LiferayDummyFactoryPortlet.java:70)

Thanks for looking into this. :blue_heart:

Regards, Tibor

sorin-pop commented 5 months ago

I have the same issue.

yasuflatland-lf commented 1 month ago

@sorin-pop @lipusz Should be resolved issue. I decided to release versions according to quarterly release convention. See the branch name match to the quarterly release.