Closed Jakubach closed 4 years ago
I think this is related to the implementation of our codes. A short and simple demo will be released soon to help you conduct experiment.
@Jakubach I have checked your codes, the problem is that you did not process the correct A and B transformations as described in the equation (6). All you need to do is to reconstruct the correct series using the transformations from the camera and the robotic base.
Hello, thank for your help. I've made corrections and I'm going to make some accuracy tests. I will probably also try to make a Python implementation and then integrate it with Robot Operating System software. Good job and stay in touch.
Hello, Im curious about your algorithm and I am trying to run it. I loaded samples: a) from robot base to robot wrist 3 link: robotBase2Wrist b) from camera to chessboard: camera2Marker I should expect result similar to given by another hand-eye algorithms: Obtained transformation: -0.994175 0.0213239 -0.105644 -0.00604253 -0.10673 -0.0586749 0.992555 0.16979 0.0149665 0.998049 0.060609 -0.034022 0 0 0 1 Instead of this I get from your algorithm example result: 0,524322 -0,838104 -0,150559 0,0668619 0,685962 0,310964 0,657843 0,161761 -0,504522 -0,448190 0,737953 -0,333273 0 0 0 1
Running looks like: [R, t, X] = proposed(robotBase2Wrist, camera2Marker, 1.0 * 10^(4)); I attach data which I use to calibration, one is in x y z qx qy qz qw notation second is in 4x4 homogenous matrices notation I also attach execution script so you can easly reproduce my results using x y z qx qy qz qw notation. Could you explain what could be wrong with my usage of your algorithm implementation? data.zip