Closed henryccl closed 2 years ago
Is the marking of the fig error? Should it be SE-YOLOv5 + NST + SSVM?
Oh, thanks for your meticulous view! The "SE-YOLOv5+NST+SE+SSVM" in Fig 9 is indeed wrong. The correct description is in Table 6 that you marked.
Is the marking of the fig error? Should it be SE-YOLOv5 + NST + SSVM?