-
Given the nature of the project we should change the license to `MPL-2.0`.
@Grufoony @NotLudovico can you comment with "yes" to confirm that you agree (IANAL but this is needed because `GPL` is copyl…
-
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
To quote from the website:
> You are free to:
>
> Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
> Adapt — remix, transform, a…
-
-
### Description
This code snippet:
~~~
/*
* Simple square root algorithm. This is from:
* http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1623375/writing-your-own-square-root-function
* Written by…
-
Version 2.5 India licenses have "a" through "j" in Definitions section, but they seem to have skipped term/condition 1c (i.e. "c" in Definitions section), though this has been long since 2007/2008
* …
gho87 updated
19 hours ago
-
### Description
Not sure if this is a bug, but an issue, at least for me.
When scanning the attached `custom-content.html` file (attached) , I get "CC-BY-NC-SA-3.0 AND CC-BY-SA-3.0" for `dete…
-
https://openregulatory.com/template-license/ says CC-BY-NC-SA, here it says CC BY. Which is right? My understanding from reading the license is that using the templates internally in a company would c…
-
It's entirely possible this is a GitHub limitation. I have yet to find a plaintext version of `CC-BY-NC-SA` that GitHub understands, but it would be great if we could find one and correct this repo:
…
-
Bonjour, je dirige le [pôle logiciels libres](https://communs.numerique.gouv.fr/) de la direction interministérielle du numérique.
Si ce projet est développé sur fonds pubilcs dans le cadre d'une m…
-
The search engine shows filters for licenses under different names, whcih are actually the same "CC0", "public domain", "CC0 1.0"
We should make sure only one of them appears in the search filters.