-
Given the nature of the project we should change the license to `MPL-2.0`.
@Grufoony @NotLudovico can you comment with "yes" to confirm that you agree (IANAL but this is needed because `GPL` is copyl…
-
The search engine shows filters for licenses under different names, whcih are actually the same "CC0", "public domain", "CC0 1.0"
We should make sure only one of them appears in the search filters.
-
The project's current license is [CC BY-NC-SA 4.0](https://github.com/Recol/DLSS-Updater/blob/main/LICENSE), which does not follow the [open source definition](https://opensource.org/osd) due to restr…
-
# LICENSE: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 | Emily Riederer
My posts are released under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International.
[https://emilyriederer.netlify.app/license/]…
-
Non-commercial (NC) clauses are non-free as they are not free software according to the [FSF](https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html#selling), open source according to the [OSI](https://opensourc…
-
Currently the default license is empty. Our terms of use say that unless otherwise specified the license is CC BY-NC-SA-4.0, it would probably be better to set this explicitly by default.
-
### 你当前使用的halo版本
2.0.0
### 你当前使用的主题版本
2.0.5
### 你的建议是否涉及到一些现有的问题?
版权声明: 本站所有文章除特别声明外,均采用 [CC BY-NC-SA 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) 许可协议。
上面这种
像这种可以改成转载的或者自定义的吗
### …
-
This is an amazing project, thank you so much @remipch for sharing it!! Fantastic work. ❤️
Other than the code (which is GPLv3), I see that the other components currently use the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 li…
-
The MaveDB project is committed to open data, so we should only allow open data licenses. This excludes the old default (and current option) CC-BY-NC-SA license.
A full list of open licenses can be…
-
PR #756 changed the license for wg-easy from a short hand-rolled license to CC BY-NC-SA-4.0.
The previous license explicitly stated that users may 'use this software for a company' but that they m…