-
The GPL isn't a great fit for non-code content, and like we did for the masterlists (see loot/loot.github.io#61) I think it would be a good idea to relicense the translations under the Creative Common…
-
The Unlicense doesn’t dedicate the source code to the public domain in all jurisdictions. It also is not as battle-tested as CC0.
https://chrismorgan.info/blog/unlicense/
https://lists.opensource.…
-
CC0 license makes this extremely difficult to use in commercial products, due to the patent clause. Any reason why this is not just MIT or Apache? We are not even using the features of this crate, ju…
-
The search engine shows filters for licenses under different names, whcih are actually the same "CC0", "public domain", "CC0 1.0"
We should make sure only one of them appears in the search filters.
-
The author name should be dct:creator, not dct:title.
This is the output of the tool currently:
``` html
To the extent possible under law,
author name
has waived all copyri…
-
I would like to make the whole tutorial available under two licenses, at the choice of the reader:
- [CC0 1.0](https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)
- [Apache License 2.0](https://ww…
-
## Problem Description
I know the CC0 has it's own FAQ - but some phrases in the FAQ is unclear to me at least on whether they apply to CC0 or not.
> All CC licenses are non-exclusive: creators …
-
Some people will view "zero-clause BSD" as not truly public domain, but CC0 as being so. Yet CC0 does attempt to address the "public domain dedication might not be legally possible in certain countrie…
-
Hi, I have a question about the CC0 1.0 Universal license used in this repository. I'm trying to understand the terms of the license and I was wondering if commercial use of the licensed work is allow…
-
The CC0 license is becoming increasingly challenging for some users.
The Fedora Project recently announced that [it will not allow new packages with CC0-licensed code (as opposed to content)](https…