-
```
There are (at lest) two files in the repository that are not licensed under the
New BSD License like the web page and the LICENCE file states.
The files and licences are:
- src/client/mac/handle…
-
```
There are (at lest) two files in the repository that are not licensed under the
New BSD License like the web page and the LICENCE file states.
The files and licences are:
- src/client/mac/handle…
-
```
There are (at lest) two files in the repository that are not licensed under the
New BSD License like the web page and the LICENCE file states.
The files and licences are:
- src/client/mac/handle…
-
```
There are (at lest) two files in the repository that are not licensed under the
New BSD License like the web page and the LICENCE file states.
The files and licences are:
- src/client/mac/handle…
-
The GPL is quite problematic for something as fundamental as an import utility.
It means that any open-source project which strives to be liberal-licensed (e.g. pypdfium2) cannot use this package.
I…
-
What an interesting project! Adding a standard license such as Apache-2 or BSD will make it easier for contributors to add code.
-
**What happened**:
License `BSD-2-Clause AND BSD-3-Clause AND Public-Domain` becomes
`LicenseRef-AND AND BSD-2-Clause AND BSD-3-Clause AND LicenseRef-Public-Domain`
**What you expected to happen*…
-
Hi, does license "BSD" mean the BSD-3-clause (https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause), or one of the other BSD licenses? Thanks!
-
I noticed that the repository currently does not have a defined license. Having a clear license informs contributors about how they can use and modify this open-source project. Without a license, the …
-
Given:
1. Detected license: `BSD-3-Clause OR GPL-2.0-only`.
2. License choice in `ort.yml`
```
license_choices:
package_license_choices:
- package_id: "NPM::node-forge:1.3.1"
license_…