-
I'm adding this here so, i wouldn't forget. Check name to negotiation.
```
std::optional opt;
...
opt = {};
opt = std::optional();
```
Problem with above, is that it's not so straightforwar…
-
I'm adding this here so, i wouldn't forget.
Example:
```
struct A
{
const std::string& getS() { return s; }
std::string s;
};
struct AProxy
{
AProxy(A& a) : a(a) {}
std:…
-
-
Hello,
I would like to explore the possibility of tidying up the following repositories:
* https://github.com/cf-convention/repository-cf
As far as I can tell, this contains a 9-year old X…
-
I suspect we don't make tarball releases any more, and that a lot of the cruft in the repo could be tidied up? I'd be quite keen to add a small Github Actions configuration here at some point in order…
-
In a similar vein to:
* #28
Unfortunately, Zig does not [currently](https://github.com/ziglang/zig/issues/9374) ship with these tools, so we would have to require users to install them.
Quest…
-
| | |
|--------------------|----|
| Bugzilla Link | [PR45071](https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45071) |
| Status | NEW |
| Importance | P normal |
|…
-
Is there a `ignore` options for ignore check rule for clang-tidy?
cxwx updated
4 months ago
-
- quantum fly trap paper should go under the microgrant section
- unify the UF staff research or make the division between the two sections about UF staff research vs Unitary Labs more clear
-
As reported on #85868 (and case inside llvm/clang fixed by #90391)
We have cases like:
```cpp
for (unsigned i = TSFlags & X86II::EVEX_K ? 2 : 1;
```
Similar to #84481 it'd be much easier to…