-
Hi @CraigRe ,
There are quite a number of occurrences in the EPCIS Guide in which we explicitly specify the usage of URNs, be it for object IDs, locations, parties, source/destination IDs, etc.
As…
-
Minor remarks on document `2021_03_23b EPCIS 2-0 COMMREV.docx`. "->" means "replace with".
I've numbered them so you can refer to these items in replies:
1) "two kinds of data: event data and mast…
-
ILMD is "Instance/Lot master data" and is defined in EPCIS 1.2 sec 7.3.6 as follows:
(Please, where can I read the draft EPCIS 2.0?)
> descriptive attributes that provide information about one o…
-
Through web payments, the current usage does not provide a consistent approach for the provisioning of the invoice: together with the goods, by a confirmation email, embedded in order confirmation on …
-
Hi @joelvogt, @mgh128
We were analyzing on way to implement the newly introduced feature Digital Link and have found out that in order to negotiate how EPC values must be returned in EPCIS events …
-
The EPCIS.ttl ontology defines classes `Source` vs `Destination`.
However, from https://ns.mh1.eu/epcis/ and examples (eg `WithDigitalLinkID/Example_9.6.2-ObjectEventWithDigitalLink.ttl`) it become…
-
Hi @mgh128 ,
Can you please throw some light on how the translation between EPC URN to DL will take place wrt Private or Industry-wide URN?
Have taken an example from 2021_03_29q CBV 2-0 COMMREV…
-
Hi @mgh128,
Can we say both https://id.gs1.org/21/2018/01/70614141123451 and https://id.gs1.org/01/70614141123451/21/2018 are a valid way to represent SGTIN as a digital link?
If not, then we sh…
-
The EPCIS ontology uses 18 `owl:union` to designate prop domains/ranges, eg:
```ttl
epcis:type a owl:DatatypeProperty , rdf:Property ;
rdfs:domain [a owl:Class ;
…
-
Hi @mgh128,
EPCIS Document with Digital link may need correction if you also agree that this DL "https://id.gs1.org/01/04012345987652" is incomplete and must not be accepted.
Below have attached l…