-
We need to decide what kind of licensing standards, documents and other codes will have when they are posted to the community space.
#### To do (in September or later)
- [ ] Meet with staff at LBL…
-
The repository doesn't contain any licensing information. Adding it might ease the integration in software packaging systems.
-
There's no licensing information in the README.md or individual source files or any indication about what license this project is under.
There was a LICENSE file in the git history, but it was move…
-
Review the code and contents of this repository to determine if it should be made private.
If private - is there a public facing section that can be utilized for Anthony's profile?
Can we remove …
-
I've submitted this project to the [Free Software Directory](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Runbox_7_App). We surmise that the software is free (as in freedom) being licensed under `GPL-3.0-or-later` …
-
**Affiliation**
MIT PSFC
**Version(s) Affected**
All
**Platform(s)**
All
**Installation Method(s)**
n/a
**Describe the bug**
This isn't the typical bug, because it doesn't interfere w…
-
### Is there an existing issue for this?
- [X] I have searched the existing issues
### Description
Heads up that Redis is also moving to a [restrictive proprietary license](https://github.com…
-
I was distributing my software under a non open source License, however after a little bit of inquiry I discovered that AppImage might contain some Restricting License as GPL software not enabling me …
-
I would be interested to hear people's views and thoughts on software licensing (MIT, GPL, etc.) and the use of OSS text software in industry, as well as proprietary software in academic research.
-
I was really excited to try out this software, but I've been completely unable to find any usable free or demo organ sample sets using your list on SourceForge. In particular:
1. A large percenta…