-
Hello,
I have a question: according to Oxford nanopore their last cells produce very accurate reads. Does "map-ont" still work as the best setting to map those reads? I am asking because the manual…
ghost updated
1 month ago
-
ghost updated
3 years ago
-
["Oxford Nanopore Technologies does not supply or support the bioconda distribution of medaka. Please raise this issue on the bioconda issues page."](https://github.com/nanoporetech/medaka/issues/513)…
-
Hello,
Because of the improvements in modified basecalling accuracy `Nanopolish` states that it does not support R10 flowcells on its GitHub. It also seems that Oxford Nanopore is investing in this…
-
Opened by Jean-Michel Carter.
Dear John,
I have been using your poreminion program but it has recently started giving me errors that seem to be related to h5py. I am using homebrew to manage Python …
-
```
(nanome) [poultrylab1@pbsnode01 nanome]$ nextflow run TheJacksonLaboratory/nanome -profile test,docker
N E X T F L O W ~ version 21.10.0
Launching `TheJacksonLaboratory/nanome` [chaotic_hamil…
-
I prefer using interleaved paired-end FASTQ, for example as output by `seqtk mergepe`. Does or could Flowcraft support this format?
-
Hi,
I'm working on a plant genome and I'm trying to assemble it with NECAT, but the final assembly I obtain is really inconsistent.
The expected genome size is 1.2 Gbp and I'm working with Oxford N…
-
The developer group agreed to pre-populate with "Illumina MiSeq" since that is the most frequently used instrument.
-
This issue is related to [JOSS](https://joss.theoj.org/) review process track by issue [#7385](https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/7385). Here I'm going to group my comments on the pap…