-
-
### Problem
Only the `owner` of the order can sign for the order - this creates the limitation that all smart orders **MUST** belong to a smart contract (supporting `ERC-1271`).
### Acceptance c…
mfw78 updated
3 months ago
-
-
# Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-04-eigenlayer/blob/398cc428541b91948f717482ec973583c9e76232/src/contracts/core/StrategyManager.sol#L283-L295
# Vulnerability details
## Impact
…
-
This was proposed by @Amxx in this PR: https://github.com/ERC725Alliance/ERC725/pull/26 on the old code base.
> owner might be a multisig, this allows read from/management of any eventual owning co…
-
# Handle
pauliax
# Vulnerability details
## Impact
You can use .selector instead of a hex number, e.g.:
// bytes4(keccak256("isValidSignature(bytes32,bytes)"))
bytes4 constant internal ERC1271…
-
we have to be careful to consider the sender of the erc1271 request.
dapps with a valid session key would be able to forge erc1271 signature for permit2 or so. seems dangerous
-
Hi, we are having some problems when users are using authereum wallet with zkSync.
It looks like this issue is caused by EIP1271 signature verification. I am wondering if it can be because there ar…
dvush updated
3 years ago
-
AuditorPraise
Medium
# rumpel wallet may not work with signatures from standard ERC1271 wallets
## Summary
some versions of safe don't work with signatures from standard ERC12271 wallets
## Vulnera…
-
**Github username:** --
**Twitter username:** --
**Submission hash (on-chain):** 0x1019c255aab9a19a1e670c220c98061a64a5c573ca47d330c4a14197c58c2fd6
**Severity:** low
**Description:**
**Description**…