-
Hi! Thank you for your great work!
I find that in the **train set**, the scale of the incomplete points clouds could sometimes be larger than its corresponding ground truth (as shown in the figure …
-
Hi
Thanks for your amazing work. Arteq is able to really provide quickly better performance compared to other baselines. I had two questions related to your repo.
I noticed that in your traini…
-
Thanks for your awesome work. Do you use the code in the render directory to generate complete point cloud and partial point cloud from 3D models for the training of point cloud completion?
-
The `devel` branch contains the version 1.0.0 which is complete redesign of the package. @H4estu @caiohamamura @ptompalski @liamirwin may I ask you to test it and provide feedback. It is designed to e…
-
## What feature are you suggesting?
**A depth camera-based lidar sensor**
### Overview:
I have been using standard AirSim lidar sensor for a while now and when it comes to simulating lidars with …
-
Hi @yuxumin,
Thanks for your contributions to build new benchmarks ShapeNet55/34. I have a question about the shapenet dataloader part. In the dataloader, the pc_norm function will normalize the poin…
-
Learning from _elytra aeronautics_, maybe.
-
Hello, I would like to ask you
How did I obtain the results under the clean condition in the paper? I used eval. py to verify the results of clean-trained. pth, but it is much worse than the results …
-
I ran the code for Minimal Python 3 example for linux and the result was as expected.
I modified the code to read two point clouds (25k points each with partial overlap) and perform the registratio…
-