-
SHACL shapes are currently very restrictive, rejecting inputs with fields that could be auto-completed.
Currently SHACL validation is executed after auto-completion, so this is currently not a proble…
-
@robertschubert or @JustinDxx can you give us an example how we can do this in an correct way?
My suggestion would be that we can use the latest version of the general ontology branch and link ther…
-
Motivation: it is very complicated to create examples for FTA/FMEA tool. If it would be simple way to validate it according to SHACL rules generated from Java files it would help a lot.
A/C:
- [x] f…
-
In SPARQL you can have a complex property path with the {n,m} form e.g `?otherClass (sh:property/sh:class){2,3} ?nodeShape .` or the {n} form `?otherClass (sh:property/sh:class){2} ?nodeShape .`.
I…
-
Hello
Appendix C here https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/#shacl-shacl provides a link (http://www.w3.org/ns/shacl-shacl ) to a shapes graph to validate shapes.
I see that this is dated from 04-04-2017 …
-
Hello,
Would it be one day possible to build ldo from SHACL shapes ?
My main motivation it to be able to use this tool: https://github.com/ULB-Darmstadt/shacl-form allongside LDO .
thhck updated
3 months ago
-
-
It would be great if support for the [NodeContraintComponent](https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/#NodeConstraintComponent)s were added to the [generate](https://shacl-play.sparna.fr/play/generate) functional…
jeswr updated
1 month ago
-
The [SHACL file](https://github.com/mobilityDCAT-AP/mobilityDCAT-AP/blob/gh-pages/releases/1.0.1/mobilitydcat-ap_shacl_shapes.ttl) has used `sh:Class` in couple places, for instancy [here](https://git…
-
Thanks for SHACL Play, it is a useful tool! This is more a question/teasing comment - and maybe you will find some of the following out of scope for SHACL Play, or find that solutions for this already…