-
## Bug report
### Expected behavior and actual behavior
Expected: no errors during the staging of files
Actual: in roughly 30% of the cases I get the error with the output below
### Steps t…
-
I see quite a range of uses for `[phenotype]` in the annotations that do not really seem to fit the definition. The [definition](http://www.ebi.ac.uk/efo/EFO_0000651) is:
> The observable form take…
-
Hi,
How should a dataset like https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pride/archive/projects/PXD003953 be annotated, which does not hold any "own" RAW files, but is a reanalysis. The submission PXD003953 does not co…
-
https://www.dropbox.com/s/xh1ehqsk42skb6w/Screenshot%202020-06-23%2014.38.16.png
https://github.com/bigbio/proteomics-metadata-standard/blob/master/templates/sdrf-human.tsv
vs
https://github.com/…
-
In the PMID: 25043054 experiment, three softwares were used to identify the peptides, and the parameter settings for each were different, as follows:
> Pepitome and MyriMatch used precursor toleran…
-
This is in response to the suggestion made in https://helpdesk.ebi.ac.uk/Ticket/Display.html?id=428177.
But first the term needs to be created in the ontology, so we need to wait
-
@levitsky we can start having sdrf.txt that contains sdrf.txt.gz because they are too big for GitHub in decompress mode. I think we should allow in the validator to validate sdrf.txt.gz
-
There is a piece of information about sample prep which is still missing in the annotations. As @StSchulze [mentioned ](https://github.com/bigbio/proteomics-metadata-standard/issues/293#issuecomment-6…
-
https://github.com/bigbio/proteomics-metadata-standard/blob/master/annotated-projects/PXD000312/sdrf.tsv
This project the PTMs are wrongly annotated because the user used excel and the AC increase …
-
@levitsky @anjaf @daichengxin :
While technical replicate is annotated always as a comment, the biological replicate is annotated sometimes as comment other as characteristics. See example here ht…