-
Could you please specify the license explicitly in the pf_ring.h file?
The absence of explicit declaration creates ambiguity when linking with the user-space pfring library.
The library itself is …
-
Saros is currently released under [GPLv2](https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.en.html). This requires a [specific project setup](https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.en.html) that our …
-
Hello,
e2guardian is currently licensed under GPLv2 "only" with OpenSSL exception. I would like to ask You to consider relicensing e2guardian to GPLv2 "or later". This would improve license compatibi…
-
### FreePBX Version
FreePBX 17
### Issue Description
When one of the office secretaries tries to transfer a call (not every time but on random) the call will get dropped. They state that it rings …
-
Part of my doubt is that I would like people to be able to build and sell devices based on this library.
I see GPLv2 as an obstacle for that.
Still I consider to publish the same initial code under …
-
```
In the root directory, LICENSE lists the LGPLv3, but the individual file
blurbs are inconsistent.
hooke.svn$ grep -ri GPL . | grep -v LICENSE
./fit.py:Licensed under the GNU GPL version 2
.…
-
Hello!
I can see that deface uses "colorize" as a dependency. However, "colorize" uses GPLv2 license, which seems to me affects all code which depends on deface, making deface's MIT license misleadi…
-
```
In the root directory, LICENSE lists the LGPLv3, but the individual file
blurbs are inconsistent.
hooke.svn$ grep -ri GPL . | grep -v LICENSE
./fit.py:Licensed under the GNU GPL version 2
.…
-
It came up in a discussion that perhaps instead of composefs having its own "write EROFS" code we could reuse liberofs from https://github.com/erofs/erofs-utils/
These are just the things I'm think…
-
@karianna: Can be whatever license the group decides on - I'd suggest that we follow the lead of the original commiter.
@neomatrix369: License - how about what other Adopt-a-JSR projects are doing ot…