-
A subtraction image inherits a lot from the new science image it is based on.
Some properties of the new image, like limiting magnitude, zero point, psf fwhm, and background (the mean b/g is zero, ho…
-
The following code doesn't work because the floating point indices are indexing the data.signal rather than the whole dataset, so there is no knowledge of the axes values.
```python
def plot_b…
-
_Issue [JP-2926](https://jira.stsci.edu/browse/JP-2926) was created on JIRA by [Tyler Pauly](https://jira.stsci.edu/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=tpauly):_
In default processing of e.g. NRS_IFU data…
-
Hello,
I started looking at your code and doc. I have seen the impressive amount of work done on improving the robustness and the speed of the code.
I couldn't find much information about the po…
gh4ag updated
3 years ago
-
the text says "The overloaded operators for ofxCvImage make such running averages straightforward." however this only seems true for ofxCvFloatImage. If the background image is a type of ofxGrayscaleI…
-
Right now on the primary feature branch, we simplify background subtraction procedure to not use the drift correction. However, we should go back to trying to use this when other diagnostics are done …
-
Also mentioned by Knight, but it's TBD if this is sufficiently a concern to implement.
Right now the background subtraction just works to subtract a constant background level, and that is expected to…
-
need a section in the documentation that says way extinction only measures scattering out of the beam and the scattering into the beam is negligible. Local background subtraction and small beam (in n…
-
Hi @luigiferiani,
I installed Tierpsy from source yesterday on my Windows 11 laptop. I have a problem in the "Set Parameters" window in the GUI. To reproduce, I select a video file, then click "Bac…
jskat updated
2 years ago
-
This is a suggestion by Anders, as an alternative to the "remove negatives", see #116 & that we currently perform the on the background
> Statistics, last paragraph in Section 4: I think we're in…