-
I don't understand why we need an ontology for this when other standards like [geonames](https://www.geonames.org/) already exist. I view it more like the issues with making gene names available for …
-
The RACK includes ontologies for ARP-4754A, DO-178C, DO-330, and MIL-STD-181D - however, these don't seem to be loaded or are not accessible via SPARQLGraph.
In particular, ARP-4754A, DO-178C and D…
-
From https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-wg/2018Nov/0402.html:
1. the introductory sentence is opaque, abstract and provides no clues about the purpose/use of the document,
replace …
-
_Provide a general summary of the issue in the Title above._
_Delete the part of the issue template that does not apply depending on whether you describe a change to an existing element / attribute o…
-
MS24 Publication on advancement and application of the event core, material samples, and the species interaction/resource relationship domain data model (M24 = May 2024)
Means of verification: Public…
-
We currently have Data Standards Developer Role, which I don't think is quite the same thing.
-
| | |
| ---- | ---- |
| **Parent** | ObjectGroup |
| **Label** | Specimen Identifier System |
| **Definition** | A locally unique identifer system used within a collection to identify a specimen…
-
Planning
- Interact with end users to see if the ontology is intuitive
- Do have product owners
- Do (practice) choose a standard to follow
- Do spend a little extra time to develop naming standar…
-
One nice aspect of pronto is that it seems able to read most ontologies using a consistent API, even though ontologies don't always follow the same standards. As seen in [these docs](https://github.co…
-
[Semantic IoT Solutions – A Developer Perspective (2019-10-22) DOI 10.13140/RG.2.2.16339.53286](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336679022_Semantic_IoT_Solutions_-_A_Developer_Perspective)
[T…