-
The options:
- MIT/BSD3c/Apache: These are all basically the same: highly permissive, do whatever, including commercial closed source forks
- GNU General Public License v3 (GPL): Copyleft for fr…
-
In order to spur future adoption of this library, and remove any concerns for its usage, I would like to re-license pirate to a dual Unlicense/MIT license. To do so, I need the following approvals fro…
-
Hi, no license is specified here which means our MIT licensed project can't use it.
Can you add a license?
-
https://github.com/mrjones/oauth has a [MIT-LICENSE.txt](https://github.com/mrjones/oauth/blob/master/MIT-LICENSE.txt) in its root but it's currently not detected:
```
E0903 20:40:47.315979 7535…
-
Hi,
I'd like to build on top of this project. Just wanted to confirm the MIT license found in the package json is how this project is licensed?
Best,
Edward
-
As there is no license on this repo, it's hard to reuse the code as part of another project.
Here is thus a suggestion to relicense into MIT.
Please answer with a sentence like “I hereby accept …
-
- KODAQS Logo GESIS , Uni Mannheim und LMU Logos, sowie funded by BMBF und EU einfügen. Leibniz Gemeinschaft kann , wenn es Platzprobleme gibt, raus
- „Datenschutz“ sieht durch die andere Schrifta…
-
This issue is for discussion about licensing of the project and the Juvix runtime. The desired license for the runtime is Apache 2.0 so that there's no issue with programs linking against it. It might…
-
Hello, it looks like you longer work on this project. We are trying port the 1.6 version to our platform, but looks like you used CC license which is in fact not designed for software. would you care …
-
# Background
Today, the information for packages' embedded license is not well integrated with nuget.org's UI. The display package page has a sidebar link to the license. For example, the MIT lice…