-
I'm thinking of changing the license to MIT from MPL-2.0, due to MPL probably being too restrictive for closed source projects that want to customize the Material Design Light design tokens (theme). I…
-
This section clearly states that it was developed for research/non-commercial purposes.
huggingface mod…
-
Ref. https://old.reddit.com/r/computervision/comments/1e3uxro/ultralytics_new_agpl30_license_exploiting/
> According to Ultralytics, both the training code and the models produced by that code are …
-
- [x] I have searched through existing issues
- [x] I have read through [docs](https://vuejs.github.io/vetur)
- [x] I have read [FAQ](https://github.com/vuejs/vetur/blob/master/docs/FAQ.md)
## In…
-
### Feature Idea
# 🐱 Sana Model Card
## Model
We introduce **Sana**, a text-to-image framework that can efficiently generate images up to 4096 × 4096 resolution.
Sana can synth…
-
When i come to the project page - It says MIT License.
When i see FAQ - It says it is Not Open Source.
Which is true here?
Can anyone help me with this?
-
I can't find any license info in this repo, are we allowed to use it? Thanks.
-
Helpful suggestion from @jangondol
> Well, in that case you may want to stick with MIT. Attribution is _only_ required in the source code (as long as the users don't delete the license file or swap y…
-
Can the license be made MIT or BSD rather than GPL? (GPL tends to prevent industry collaborators for using/reusing the code.)
-
Apache license file contains just short notice to be used in source files. Not a full license text, which it should.
I think it should be replaced with file obtained from URL: https://www.apache.or…