-
ewftools-x64.zip is distributing libewf LGPL licensed code without adhering to LGPLv3, it is possibly also violating the zlib and bzip2 licenses
-
Hello, I've recently noticed that the DJI SDK includes the [`com.vividsolutions:jts:1.8`](https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.vividsolutions/jts/1.8) library, which is licensed under the [LGPLv3](h…
-
Dear maintainers, @brgl,
I noticed that the the libgpiod cxx bindings have been re-licensed from LGPLv2+ to LGPLv3+ starting from version 2.0.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/libs/libgpiod/libgpiod…
bshm updated
6 months ago
-
I was thinking about switching to GPL-3.0-or-later or at least to LGPL-3.0-or-later. Do you think it would be good?
-
It seems the current license is [LGPL-2.1-only](https://spdx.org/licenses/LGPL-2.1-only.html), which means when mixing this library code with LGPLv3 code, the code from this library will be convey to …
-
Hi. I noticed that the original repository switched the license to LGPLv3 as stated in https://github.com/profmaad/librabbitmq-objc/commit/9c7f067c1f293e617a31d06fe8738faf8e4d6f14
Could you change th…
-
-
```
In the root directory, LICENSE lists the LGPLv3, but the individual file
blurbs are inconsistent.
hooke.svn$ grep -ri GPL . | grep -v LICENSE
./fit.py:Licensed under the GNU GPL version 2
.…
-
```
In the root directory, LICENSE lists the LGPLv3, but the individual file
blurbs are inconsistent.
hooke.svn$ grep -ri GPL . | grep -v LICENSE
./fit.py:Licensed under the GNU GPL version 2
.…
-
Redis have changed their licence (see https://github.com/redis/redis/pull/13157), so we should probably change to an alternate fork.
There appear to be 2 main options - licensed differently:
Red…