-
We need to create both ontology and SHACL in order to use OpenLABEL for our extended metadata.
Right now, I already created an ontology-draft for OpenLABEL in separate branch, s.:
https://github.c…
-
I've long argued against including SHACL shapes with gist, since an upper ontology itself is not populated with data and SHACL by nature is implementation-specific. However, it now occurs to me that t…
-
Hi Thomas,
Here is a description of what I would think is a bug in the generation of shacl shapes from OWL.
To reproduce:
```
java -jar shacl-play-app-0.7.0-onejar.jar owl2shacl -i skos.owl -o…
-
I believe that checking the validity of templates should be included in the shapes. I'm not sure whether SPARQL's regular expressions allow for recursion, but it can be achieved by:
- removing the …
-
@robertschubert or @JustinDxx can you give us an example how we can do this in an correct way?
My suggestion would be that we can use the latest version of the general ontology branch and link ther…
-
I have found it useful to be able to easily find Node Shapes for a given class. There are a handful of scenarios.
In one, an operation `expects` a class which is described by multiple shapes.
``…
-
Motivation: it is very complicated to create examples for FTA/FMEA tool. If it would be simple way to validate it according to SHACL rules generated from Java files it would help a lot.
A/C:
- [x] f…
-
SHACL shapes are currently very restrictive, rejecting inputs with fields that could be auto-completed.
Currently SHACL validation is executed after auto-completion, so this is currently not a proble…
-
https://github.com/Health-RI/health-ri-metadata/blob/88009525aeff489817fe901454a381b0642a8504/Formalisation(shacl)/Core/coreRules.shapes.ttl#L33
should be http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name according t…
-
We haven't looked at SHACL shapes for a while, and I'd guess they can take improvement. (@mgh128 what's your assessment?)
We also must address the following issues:
- #196 avoid `owl:sameAs` (@mko…