PPX extension for JSON literals and patterns. It supports yojson
and
ezjsonm
.
Based on an original idea by @emillon.
ppx_yojson
lets you write Yojson
or Ezjsonm
expressions and patterns
using ocaml syntax to make your code more concise and readable.
It rewrites %yojson
and %ezjsonm
extension points based on the content of
the payload.
For example you can turn:
let json =
`List
[ `Assoc
[ ("name", `String "Anne")
; ("grades", `List [`String "A"; `String "B-"; `String "B+"]
]
; `Assoc
[ ("name", `String "Bernard")
; ("grades", `List [`String "B+"; `String "A"; `String "B-"]
]
]
into:
let json =
[%yojson
[ {name = "Anne"; grades = ["A"; "B-"; "B+"]}
; {name = "Bernard"; grades = ["B+"; "A"; "B-"]}
]
]
You can install ppx_yojson
using opam:
$ opam install ppx_yojson
If you're building your library or app with dune, add the following field to
your library
, executable
or test
stanza:
(preprocess (pps ppx_yojson))
You can now use the %yojson
or %ezjsonm
extensions in your code. See the
expressions and
patterns sections for the
detailed syntax.
The expression rewriter supports the following Yojson
and Ezjsonm
values:
Null
: [%yojson None]
or [%ezjsonm None]
Bool of bool
: [%yojson true]
or [%ezjsonm true]
Float of float
: [%yojson 1.2e+10]
or [%ezjsonm 1.2e+10]
. Note that with
%ezjsonm
all numeric literals are converted to Float of float
.Int of int
: [%yojson 0xff]
. As long as the int literal in the payload fits in an int
,
the 0x
, 0o
and 0b
notations are accepted.Intlit of string
: [%yojson 100000000000000000000000000000000]
. For arbitrary long integers.
int64
, int32
and nativeint
literals are also rewritten as Intlit
for consistency with
ppx_deriving_yojson
.
0x
, 0o
and 0b
notations are currently not supported and the rewriter will raise an error.String of string
: [%yojson "abc"]
or [%ezjsonm "abc"]
List of json list
: [%yojson [1; 2; 3]]
. It supports mixed type list as well such as
["a"; 2]
.A of value list
: [%ezjsonm ["a"; 2]]
Assoc of (string * json) list
: [%yojson {a = 1; b = "b"}]
O of (string * value) list
: [%ezjsonm {a = 1; b = "b"}]
The resulting expression are not constrained, meaning it works with
Yojson.Safe
or Yojson.Basic
regardless.
You can escape regular Yojson
or Ezjsonm
expressions within a payload using
[%aq json_expr]
. You can use this to insert variables in the payload. For
example:
let a = `String "a"
let json = [%yojson { a = [%aq a]; b = "b"}]
is rewritten as:
let a = `String "a"
let json = `Assoc [("a", a); (b, `String "b")]
Note that the payload in a %aq
extension should always subtype one of the Yojson
types.
Note that the pattern extension expects a pattern payload and must thus be invoked as
[%yojson? pattern]
or [%ezjsonm? pattern]
.
The pattern rewriter supports the following:
Null
, Bool of bool
, Float of float
, Int of int
, Intlit of string
,
String of string
, List of json list
with the same syntax as for
expressions and will be rewritten to a pattern matching that json value.Assoc of (string * json) list
and O of (string * value) list
with the same
syntax as for expressions but with a few restrictions. The record pattern in
the payload must be closed (ie no ; _}
) and have less than 4 fields. See
details below.Ezjsonm.value
, Yojson.Safe.json
or whatever Yojson
type you're
using that's compatible with the above.Json objects fields order doesn't matter so you'd expect the {a = 1; b = true}
pattern to match
regardless of the parsed json being {"a": 1, "b": true}
or {"b": true, "a": 1}
.
Since json objects are represented as lists, the order of the fields in the rewritten pattern does matter.
To allow you to write such patterns concisely and without having to care for the order of the
fields, the record pattern is expanded to an or-pattern that matches every permutation of the
(string * json) list
. This is the reason of the limitations mentioned in the above list.
Also note that there is no limitation on nesting such patterns but you probably want to avoid doing
that too much.
This is provided mostly for convenience. If you want efficient code and/or to handle complex json
objects I recommend that you use
ppx_deriving_yojson
or
ppx_yojson_conv
instead.
To clarify, the following code:
let f = function
| [%yojson? {a = 1; b = true}] -> (1, true)
is expanded into:
let f = function
| ( `Assoc [("a", `Int 1); ("b", `Bool true)]
| `Assoc [("b", `Bool true); ("a", `Int 1)]
) -> (1, true)
You can also escape regular Ezjsonm
or Yojson
patterns in ppx_yojson
pattern
extensions' payload using [%aq? json_pat]
. You can use it to further
deconstruct a JSON value. For example:
let f = function
| [%yojson? {a = [%aq? `Int i]} -> i + 1
is expanded into:
let f = function
| `Assoc [("a", `Int i)] -> i + 1
Some valid JSON object key's name are not valid OCaml record fields. Any
capitalized word or OCaml keyword such as type
or object
.
You can still assemble such JSON literals with ppx_yojson
using a leading
underscore in the record field name. It will strip exactly one leading
underscore.
For example, the following:
let json = [%yojson { _type = "a"; __object = "b"}]
will be expanded to:
let json = `Assoc [("type", `String "a"); ("_object", `String "b")]
Alternatively, you can attach an [@as "key_name"]
attribute to the relevant
field to provide the key to use in the JSON object literal.
The following:
let json = [%yojson {dummy = "a" [@as "type"]; some_key = "b"}
will be expanded to:
let json = `Assoc [("type", `String "a"); ("some_key", `String "b")]