search

TJamara / Saturn-s_Moons_Simulation

N-body model of Saturn and some of its moons with python.
GNU General Public License v3.0
0 stars 0 forks source link
celestial celestial-bodies celestial-mechanics horizons isaac model modeling modeling-and-simulation moon n-body n-body-problem n-body-simulation n-body-simulator newton python python3 satellite satellites saturn

readme

Saturn's Moons

N-body model of Saturn and some of its moons.
This is a new version of the model that stems from this repository whose author is itztli.

Authors

Rafael Pérez - tinoco21.30@gmail.com
Elena Bedolla - maria.elena.bedolla.zamudio@gmail.com
Javier Navarro - javojavojavojavo@gmail.com

Afiliation

LOGO-UNAM-ENES_copia
We are BS IT students at UNAM (Universidad Nacional Autómoma de México) specifically at the ENES (Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores) Morelia.
Degree name: Licenciatura en Tecnologías para la Información en Ciencias (IT in science)

License

GNU General Public License v3.0

Requirements

The following python3 libraries:

Tested on Ubuntu20 and Windows10 in a conda environment.

Execution

Clone git and run n-body.py

Introduction

The n-body problem was a mathematical model suggested by Isaac Newton in 1687 to model the behavior of our planetary system, although this technique has been of great help in the modeling of any planetary orbit. Orbit modeling relies on creating mathematical models to simulate the motion of a massive body as it orbits another masive body due to gravity.

Saturn has 82 confirmed moons with diameter ranging from a few meters to larger than that of the planet Mercury. Their orbits are different from those of their rings and their orbital periods also vary, for exampe that of Hyperion lasts 21 days and that of Mimas lasts only 24 hours. In this work we'll use the integrative numerical model of n-bodies using Newton's laws to model Saturn and some of its moons since we don't have the computational resources to model them all.

Newton's Laws and Position Integration

Newton's Second Law

$$F = ma$$

Universal Gravitational Law

$$F = \frac{GMm}{r^2}$$

In the 3-dimensional vector field, the gravitational force ($F$) becomes a vector, and a unit vector ($\mathbf{u}$) is introduced to indicate the direction of the forces. Additionally, we divide by $r^2$.

N-bodies

The law of universal gravitation describes the force between two bodies. To generalize it to n-bodies, we can sum up the forces acting on each body.

The sum is given by: $$F = GM \sum_{i} \left(\frac{mi}{r{i}^3}\right)\mathbf{u}_i$$

Substituting $F = ma$: $$a = G \sum_{i} \left(\frac{mi}{r{i}^3}\right)\mathbf{u}_i$$

Since $a = \frac{dv}{dt}$: $$\frac{dv}{dt} = G \sum_{i} \left(\frac{mi}{r{i}^3}\right)\mathbf{u}_i$$

Integrating with respect to time: $$v = G \int \sum_{i} \left(\frac{mi}{r{i}^3}\right)\mathbf{u}_i \ dt$$

As nothing depends on time, we simplify to: $$v = G \sum_{i} \left(\frac{mi}{r{i}^3}\right)\mathbf{u}_i(t_1 - t_0)$$

Expressing velocity in terms of displacement: $$v = G \left(\sum_{i} \left(\frac{mi}{r{i}^3}\right)\mathbf{u}_i\right)\Delta t$$

Knowing $v = \frac{dx}{dt}$, we integrate: $$x = \int v \ dt$$

Assuming small time intervals ($\Delta t$): $$x = v \int \ dt$$ $$x = v\Delta t$$

The calculated $x$ represents the change in position after a certain $\Delta t$. To find the new position, we add this change to the old position.

Justification

Establish a precedent for a specific modeling of the moons of Saturn and at the same time use, discover or/and create and implement techniques that allow us to make an optimal model which will serve as a tool to know the Saturn system and know what will happen to it in the future.

Objectives

Methodology and implementation

Units

G is defined as a global variable considering the above units.

Classes and methods

Particle

The Particle class helps us to create particle objects, each one with its respective position, velocity, mass, trajectory and time (initialized at 0).

Particle Methods

Potential

The Potential class puts all particle objects to work. It is initialized with a list of Particle objects, in this case Saturn and its moons, and with the dt.

Integrative method

It has 2 tasks:
The first consists of iterating the particles all against all and updating their velocity taking into account each interaction. The second task is to update the position of all the particles using the previously updated velocity.

Defining particles and parameters

To iterate the model, we must first define how many times it is going to be iterated and what size the dt is going to be in each iteration. We also have to keep track of the elapsed time to save the trajectory that includes time and position. Additionally we have to create particle objects (Saturn and its moons in this case), whose initial conditions of December 24, 2020 are stored in lunas.json.

Now we can iterate.

Plot

Using the list of positions (trajectory) of each particle, we plot each one with a different color and Saturn with a radius greater than that of its moons.

Divergence Plot

To graph the divergence, we compare the calculations from our model against the data from the actual Horizons observations. For this we write in mimas_data.txt and iapetus_data.txt the daily positions of Mimas and Iapetus in an interval of 30 days. The read_horizon() funciton reads this data to later compare it with that generated by the model.

Data source

Example: Mimas and Saturn

The following image shows the initial conditions (position and velocity) of Mimas with respect to Saturn. Saturn being the reference frame, is the origin (position 0,0,0) in space and has no initial velocities (0,0,0). More data queries can be done on NASA's Horizons here.

image

Tests

We start with the parameters proposed in the original work: dt = 1 and lenTime of 1 month.

1: 5 bodies, dt= 0.5 and 3 months of modeling (minutes in execution)

The plot took approximately 4 hours. Later we did tests with larger dts to decrease the execution and graphing time. Note that we are plotting points, but they are so close together that they look like lines.
r1_2

2: With a few hours of modeling (+ minutes in execution), we realized that with dt = 1 it does converge

Now we included the 8 bodies and modeled less time. The tests where successful, but the execution time was increased.
p1

To try to optimize a bit and make the graph less heavy, we decided to graph fewer points for each body.

We graph 60 points for each body, that is, we save the positions of each particle every (1,296,000 ÷ 60) iterations and then we graph them, with 1,296,000 being the total iterations in 30 days of modeling and dt = 2.
Captura de pantalla (355)

Results

After several more tests, we found that dt = 2 gave us the fastest results without sacrificing convergence. 8 bodies are included in the modeled system: Saturn, Mimas, Enceladus, Tethys, Dione, Rhea, Titan and Iapetus. The modeled time interval is 30 days: December 24, 2020 to January 23, 2021. The total execution time was approximately 10 minutes.

Divergence plot (using Mimas and Iapetus)

The error (divergence) is calculated with the Euclidean distance between real measurements of position (from Horizons) of each month (30 measurements) and those generated with this model. The calculation of the error was made using only the positions of Mimas and those of Iapetus.

Mimas

Error_conjunto_mimas
It turns out that Mimas does not converge, wich was very strange to us because the graph shows that Mimas deviates too much, and our dotted plots do not show such extreme disturbances (Of 100%!). After several tests we saw that Mimas was lagging in each iteration, as if it were moving in slow motion on the correct path. That is why it went unnoticed in the testing stage, the error was hidden.

Iapetus

Error_conjunto_Iapetus
It occurred to us to measure the divergence of Iapetus, since unlike Mimas, which has the shortest (and narrowest) orbital period of 0.9 days, this one has the longest of 79 days. It diverges much less, it does not even reach 0.01 e/dp.

Orbits visualization

R1

R3
In this image it is observed that the orbits of the Moons of saturn are not all in the same plane.

Captura de pantalla (354)

Conclusions

We satisfactorily met the objectives.

We designed a metric to evaluate our model, which consisted of comparing its predictions with real measurements. And although the convergence results of the model were mixed, we realized the possibility that in the modeling of a system some bodies converge and others do not. We did many more experiments with smaller dt's (eg 0.25) but we did not see any improvement.

Mimas divergence hypothesis

We believe that a much smaller dt is necessary to converge with the solution of much narrower orbits like Mimas. The 'motion' of each particle in the model from one dt to another is straight, the smallness of dt makes the motion appear curved. The idea is that Mimas's orbit is so small that the dt no longer apperars to be that small to it, so the modeled orbit starts to look more like a polygon than a curve. Each dt the particle advances too much and for the next dt it has to correct the trajectory a lot, leaving a 'peak' outside the real orbit, with the iterations the peaks accumulate and the particle is lagging behind because it is traveling further (passing by the peaks). However, at the moment we do not have enough evidence to affirm it. The question of how to model a system whose bodies need very different dt's to converge naturally arises.

We were able to consistently visualize the orbits of Saturn's moons.

We found the optimal dt at least for Iapetus, starting from the dt = 1 proposed in the work on which this one was based.

We reduced the number of points to plot on the plot, making it much more efficient.

We were able to experience how quickly the resources to execute the code and visualize the plot increase as we increase the number of particles and the time to model, hence the importance of choosing the optimal dt to reduce operations by orders of magnitude.

We need to keep doing experiments.

Bibliography