issues
search
bkudrzycki
/
3_cqp
Paper 2
0
stars
0
forks
source link
issues
Newest
Newest
Most commented
Recently updated
Oldest
Least commented
Least recently updated
Formal TVET vs. informal training comparison
#108
bkudrzycki
opened
1 year ago
0
Abstract: separate results for informal and dual app.
#107
bkudrzycki
opened
1 year ago
0
Fix title
#106
bkudrzycki
closed
1 year ago
0
Table 9 - take out logs, why so few observations?
#105
bkudrzycki
opened
1 year ago
0
P 32: if model V can only be calculated for 28 apprentices I would take it out
#104
bkudrzycki
opened
1 year ago
0
Interpreting net benefits, re-estimating apprentice productivity
#103
bkudrzycki
opened
1 year ago
0
P 31: you write that allowances to CQP are much higher – then why do you estimate their productivity in Table 7 lower?
#102
bkudrzycki
opened
1 year ago
0
Table 7 - few observation for model totals. Use mean wage per sector to calculate productivity?
#101
bkudrzycki
opened
1 year ago
0
Page 28: why would they give so much higher allowances to CQP applicants then to non-applicants -> Rubain any ideas?
#100
bkudrzycki
opened
1 year ago
0
Is there no change in allowances over time for the youth?
#99
bkudrzycki
opened
1 year ago
0
Table 6: is entry fee total divided by 4?
#98
bkudrzycki
closed
1 year ago
0
Table 5
#97
bkudrzycki
opened
1 year ago
2
Page 22: I also find the infrastructure costs a bit shaky in particular related to the infrastructure, but now only one of several models so that helps
#96
bkudrzycki
opened
1 year ago
0
Page 21: what is the variance of wages (for trained employees) across firms
#95
bkudrzycki
opened
1 year ago
0
Page 21: 4 years realistic?
#94
bkudrzycki
opened
1 year ago
0
Is table 3 based on Bolli?
#93
bkudrzycki
opened
1 year ago
0
Table 3: also check if 20 days/12 months makes sense for Rubain and whether trainer when they train don’t work (I think this is very unlikely)
#92
bkudrzycki
opened
1 year ago
0
Think about how to remove emphasis from bad models, i.e. II and V
#91
bkudrzycki
opened
1 year ago
0
Page 20: Table 3: no change of allowances over time?
#90
bkudrzycki
opened
1 year ago
0
Page 20: Table 3: how good is the assumption that they train 4 years on average? Where is this coming from? What happens if you consider a longer period? What does Rubain say about this assumption?
#89
bkudrzycki
opened
1 year ago
0
Page 20: Table 3: I assume that entry and exit fees are part of annual fees?
#88
bkudrzycki
opened
1 year ago
0
Page 18: can we also look at whether the allowances they got changed over time?
#87
bkudrzycki
opened
1 year ago
0
Page 17: Not fully clear yet from the writing whether drop out was really high or rather low
#86
bkudrzycki
opened
1 year ago
0
Page 17: the endline survey was conducted three years later
#85
bkudrzycki
opened
1 year ago
0
Fix p-values in Table 2
#84
bkudrzycki
opened
1 year ago
0
Table 2: Any idea why did not apply youth were less likely to train at endline, given that they were on average younger at baseline?
#83
bkudrzycki
opened
1 year ago
0
Page 12: how many days are they in formal training with the CQP
#82
bkudrzycki
opened
1 year ago
0
CQP reform: also about regulation of the informal apprenticeship market, no?
#81
bkudrzycki
opened
1 year ago
0
Page 11: emphasize again that this is a dual system
#80
bkudrzycki
opened
1 year ago
0
Page 10 second paragraph: difficult to follow the writing here
#79
bkudrzycki
opened
1 year ago
0
Study from Hardy - was this dual apprenticeship or not?
#78
bkudrzycki
opened
1 year ago
0
Split lit review into two parts: informal apprenticeship and dual TVET
#77
bkudrzycki
opened
1 year ago
0
Bottom page 6: you write that there are only two attempts to quantify the impact of dual systems in Africa -> with regard to informal or formal or both labor markets?
#76
bkudrzycki
opened
1 year ago
0
Throughout the intro please differentiate clearly between formal TVET and dual TVET
#75
bkudrzycki
opened
1 year ago
0
add structure to list of disadvantages of informal apprenticeship
#74
bkudrzycki
opened
1 year ago
0
Support statement that apprenticeships may be "too long"
#73
bkudrzycki
opened
1 year ago
0
support statement: informal apprenticeships are more effective than formal TVET
#72
bkudrzycki
opened
1 year ago
0
The abstract is still a bit moving back and forth – I would first present the results with regard to informal and then the results with regard to dual
#71
bkudrzycki
opened
1 year ago
0
In the title and abstract I would either stick to traditional or informal apprenticeship
#70
bkudrzycki
closed
1 year ago
0
ADDITIONAL IDEAS
#69
bkudrzycki
opened
2 years ago
0
Add Table: Net benefits accruing to apprentice BY FIRM SIZE
#68
bkudrzycki
opened
2 years ago
0
Table A11 adjustments (wages)
#67
bkudrzycki
opened
2 years ago
0
Table 6 footnote
#66
bkudrzycki
opened
2 years ago
0
graduation regression
#65
bkudrzycki
opened
2 years ago
1
control for baseline education in skills regression (Table 5)
#64
bkudrzycki
closed
2 years ago
0
change crosses to numbers in regression table footnotes for consistency
#63
bkudrzycki
closed
2 years ago
0
fix foregone productivity variable
#62
bkudrzycki
closed
2 years ago
0
firm level regression: additional covariates
#61
bkudrzycki
opened
2 years ago
1
move all tables/figures into proper chunks
#60
bkudrzycki
closed
2 years ago
0
add cost/benefits statistics into text
#59
bkudrzycki
closed
2 years ago
0
Next