Persistence landscapes are a vectorization of persistence data/diagrams that have useful statistical properties including linearity and an inner product.[^1] This is an R package interface to a C++ library to efficienctly compute and calculate with persistence landscapes.[^2]
Until the package is on CRAN, use pak to install the package from the GitHub repository as follows:
install.packages("pak")
pak::pkg_install("corybrunson/plt")
Alternatively—and especially if you want to contribute—you can clone or download the code repository and, from within the directory, install the package from source:
devtools::install()
You should now be able to load the package normally from an R session:
library(plt)
The plt package supports various operations involving persistence landscapes:
Examples and tests in plt rely on other packages to simulate data and to compute persistence diagrams from data:
plt introduces the ‘Rcpp_PersistenceLandscape’ S4 class, which is
exposed using Rcpp from the underlying ‘PersistenceLandscape’ C++
class. Instances of this class can be created using new()
but the
recommended way is to use landscape()
. This function accepts either a
single matrix of persistence data or a specially formatted list with the
class 'persistence_diagram"
. The $pairs
entry of the list is itself
a list, of a 2-column matrix of persistence pairs for each homological
degree from 0 ($pairs[[1]]
) to the maximum degree calculated. The
generic converter as_persistence()
includes methods for outputs from
ripserr::vietoris_rips()
and from TDA::*Diag()
; it operates under
the hood of landscape()
, but we invoke it explicitly here for
illustration.
To begin an illustration, we noisily sample 60 points from a figure eight and compute the persistence diagram of the point cloud:
set.seed(513611L)
pc <- tdaunif::sample_lemniscate_gerono(60, sd = .1)
plot(pc, asp = 1, pch = 16L)
pd <- ripserr::vietoris_rips(pc, dim = 1, threshold = 2, p = 2)
#> Warning in vietoris_rips.matrix(pc, dim = 1, threshold = 2, p = 2): `dim`
#> parameter has been deprecated; use `max_dim` instead.
print(pd)
#> PHom object containing persistence data for 63 features.
#>
#> Contains:
#> * 59 0-dim features
#> * 4 1-dim features
#>
#> Radius/diameter: min = 0; max = 0.63582.
We the convert the persistence data to the preferred persistence diagram format and inspect some of its features:
pd <- as_persistence(pd)
print(pd)
#> 'persistence' data computed up to degree 1:
#>
#> * 0-degree features: 59
#> * 1-degree features: 4
print(head(pd$pairs[[1]]))
#> [,1] [,2]
#> [1,] 0 0.01918952
#> [2,] 0 0.01947548
#> [3,] 0 0.02604350
#> [4,] 0 0.04218479
#> [5,] 0 0.04542467
#> [6,] 0 0.05941691
print(head(pd$pairs[[2]]))
#> [,1] [,2]
#> [1,] 0.4809292 0.6358225
#> [2,] 0.3016234 0.6075172
#> [3,] 0.2504500 0.2727915
#> [4,] 0.2251884 0.2300871
This allows us to compute a persistence landscape—in this case, for the 1-dimensional features. Here we compute the landscape exactly, which can be cost-prohibitive for larger persistence data, and print its summary:
pl1 <- landscape(pd, degree = 1, exact = TRUE)
print(pl1)
#> Persistence landscape (exact format) of 2 levels over (0,0.636)
summary(pl1)
#> Internal representation: exact
#> Number of levels: 2
#> Representation limits: ( 0.22519 , 0.6358 )
#> Landscape range: ( 0 , 0.15295 )
#> Magnitude: 0.0026959
#> Integral: 0.029522
Some advanced concepts like the magnitude of a landscape will be explained below.
The object pl1
is not an array, but rather an object that encapsulates
both the data that encode a landscape and several basic operations that
can be performed on it. This allows us to work with persistence
landscapes without worrying about pre-processing their representations.
At any point, the underlying encoding of the landscape can be extracted
using $getInternal()
, which in the case of an exactly calculated
landscape returns a list of 2-column matrices, each matrix containing
coordinates that define one level of the landscape as a piecewise linear
function:
print(length(pl1$getInternal()))
#> [1] 2
print(pl1$getInternal())
#> [[1]]
#> [,1] [,2]
#> [1,] -Inf 0.000000000
#> [2,] 0.2251884 0.000000000
#> [3,] 0.2276378 0.002449358
#> [4,] 0.2300871 0.000000000
#> [5,] 0.2504500 0.000000000
#> [6,] 0.2616207 0.011170764
#> [7,] 0.2727915 0.000000000
#> [8,] 0.3016234 0.000000000
#> [9,] 0.4545703 0.152946885
#> [10,] 0.5442232 0.063293964
#> [11,] 0.5583759 0.077446647
#> [12,] 0.6358225 0.000000000
#> [13,] Inf 0.000000000
#>
#> [[2]]
#> [,1] [,2]
#> [1,] -Inf 0.00000000
#> [2,] 0.4809292 0.00000000
#> [3,] 0.5442232 0.06329396
#> [4,] 0.6075172 0.00000000
#> [5,] Inf 0.00000000
An alternative, approximate construction computes the value of each
level of the landscape at each point on a 1-dimensional grid, ranging
from xmin
to xmax
at increments of xby
. A landscape constructed
using a discrete approximation is stored as a 3-dimensional array of
dimensions (levels, values, 2), with one level per feature (some of
which may be trivial) and one value per grid point, stored as $x,y$
pairs along the third dimension.
b_ran <- pl_support(pl1)
pl1d <- landscape(pd, degree = 1,
xmin = b_ran[[1L]], xmax = b_ran[[2L]], xby = 0.05)
print(dim(pl1d$getInternal()))
#> [1] 4 10 2
print(pl1d$getInternal())
#> , , 1
#>
#> [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6] [,7]
#> [1,] 0.2251884 0.2751884 0.3251884 0.3751884 0.4251884 0.4751884 0.5251884
#> [2,] 0.2251884 0.2751884 0.3251884 0.3751884 0.4251884 0.4751884 0.5251884
#> [3,] 0.2251884 0.2751884 0.3251884 0.3751884 0.4251884 0.4751884 0.5251884
#> [4,] 0.2251884 0.2751884 0.3251884 0.3751884 0.4251884 0.4751884 0.5251884
#> [,8] [,9] [,10]
#> [1,] 0.5751884 0.6251884 0.6751884
#> [2,] 0.5751884 0.6251884 0.6751884
#> [3,] 0.5751884 0.6251884 0.6751884
#> [4,] 0.5751884 0.6251884 0.6751884
#>
#> , , 2
#>
#> [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6] [,7] [,8]
#> [1,] 0 0 0.02356502 0.07356502 0.123565 0.1323288 0.08232875 0.06063412
#> [2,] 0 0 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.000000 0.0000000 0.04425917 0.03232875
#> [3,] 0 0 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.000000 0.0000000 0.00000000 0.00000000
#> [4,] 0 0 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.000000 0.0000000 0.00000000 0.00000000
#> [,9] [,10]
#> [1,] 0.01063412 0
#> [2,] 0.00000000 0
#> [3,] 0.00000000 0
#> [4,] 0.00000000 0
Exactly computed landscapes can be converted to discrete landscape
objects, but the other direction is not well-defined. Below, we view a
portion of the discretized exact landscape, using the default bounds and
resolution given to pl1
:
# default conversion to discrete uses `xby = 0.001`
pl1_ <- pl1$discretize()
print(dim(pl1_$getInternal()))
#> [1] 2 636 2
# print first 12 x-coordinates
pl1_$getInternal()[, seq(230L, 270L), , drop = FALSE]
#> , , 1
#>
#> [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6] [,7] [,8] [,9] [,10] [,11] [,12]
#> [1,] 0.229 0.23 0.231 0.232 0.233 0.234 0.235 0.236 0.237 0.238 0.239 0.24
#> [2,] 0.229 0.23 0.231 0.232 0.233 0.234 0.235 0.236 0.237 0.238 0.239 0.24
#> [,13] [,14] [,15] [,16] [,17] [,18] [,19] [,20] [,21] [,22] [,23] [,24]
#> [1,] 0.241 0.242 0.243 0.244 0.245 0.246 0.247 0.248 0.249 0.25 0.251 0.252
#> [2,] 0.241 0.242 0.243 0.244 0.245 0.246 0.247 0.248 0.249 0.25 0.251 0.252
#> [,25] [,26] [,27] [,28] [,29] [,30] [,31] [,32] [,33] [,34] [,35] [,36]
#> [1,] 0.253 0.254 0.255 0.256 0.257 0.258 0.259 0.26 0.261 0.262 0.263 0.264
#> [2,] 0.253 0.254 0.255 0.256 0.257 0.258 0.259 0.26 0.261 0.262 0.263 0.264
#> [,37] [,38] [,39] [,40] [,41]
#> [1,] 0.265 0.266 0.267 0.268 0.269
#> [2,] 0.265 0.266 0.267 0.268 0.269
#>
#> , , 2
#>
#> [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5]
#> [1,] 0.0006539916 5.241935e-05 4.985605e-05 4.729276e-05 4.472946e-05
#> [2,] 0.0000000000 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00
#> [,6] [,7] [,8] [,9] [,10]
#> [1,] 4.216616e-05 3.960287e-05 3.703957e-05 3.447627e-05 3.191297e-05
#> [2,] 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00
#> [,11] [,12] [,13] [,14] [,15]
#> [1,] 2.934968e-05 2.678638e-05 2.422308e-05 2.165979e-05 1.909649e-05
#> [2,] 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00
#> [,16] [,17] [,18] [,19] [,20] [,21]
#> [1,] 1.653319e-05 1.396989e-05 1.14066e-05 8.8433e-06 6.280002e-06 3.716705e-06
#> [2,] 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 0.00000e+00 0.0000e+00 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00
#> [,22] [,23] [,24] [,25] [,26] [,27]
#> [1,] 1.153408e-06 0.0009623328 0.001923512 0.002884692 0.003845871 0.00480705
#> [2,] 0.000000e+00 0.0000000000 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.00000000
#> [,28] [,29] [,30] [,31] [,32] [,33]
#> [1,] 0.00576823 0.006729409 0.007690589 0.008651768 0.009612947 0.01057413
#> [2,] 0.00000000 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.00000000
#> [,34] [,35] [,36] [,37] [,38] [,39]
#> [1,] 0.009677368 0.00878061 0.007883851 0.006987093 0.006090334 0.005193576
#> [2,] 0.000000000 0.00000000 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.000000000
#> [,40] [,41]
#> [1,] 0.004296817 0.003400059
#> [2,] 0.000000000 0.000000000
We can also specify the bounds and the resolution of the discretization:
pl1 <- pl_delimit(pl1, xmin = 0, xmax = 1, xby = 0.1)
pl1_ <- pl_discretize(pl1)
pl1_$getInternal()
#> , , 1
#>
#> [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6] [,7] [,8] [,9] [,10] [,11]
#> [1,] 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
#> [2,] 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
#>
#> , , 2
#>
#> [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6] [,7] [,8] [,9] [,10]
#> [1,] 0 0 0 0.09837659 0.1075172 0.03582254 0.000000000 0 0 0
#> [2,] 0 0 0 0.00000000 0.0000000 0.04388611 0.003068344 0 0 0
#> [,11]
#> [1,] 0
#> [2,] 0
plt provides a plot()
method for the ‘Rcpp_PersistenceLandscape’
class. It uses grDevices to build color palettes, and as such its
default palette is viridis; but the user may supply the name of a
recognized palette or a sequence of colors between which to interpolate:
n_levs <- max(pl_num_levels(pl1), pl_num_levels(pl1d))
par(mfrow = c(2L, 1L), mar = c(2, 2, 0, 2))
plot(pl1, palette = "terrain", n_levels = n_levs, asp = 1)
plot(pl1d, palette = "terrain", n_levels = n_levs, asp = 1)
par(mfrow = c(1L, 1L), mar = c(5.1, 4.1, 4.1, 2.1))
To illustrate these features, we first generate a companion data set:
# a new landscape and its discretization
set.seed(772888L)
pc2 <- tdaunif::sample_circle(60, sd = .1) / 2
pd2 <- ripserr::vietoris_rips(pc2, dim = 1, threshold = 2, p = 2)
#> Warning in vietoris_rips.matrix(pc2, dim = 1, threshold = 2, p = 2): `dim`
#> parameter has been deprecated; use `max_dim` instead.
pl2 <- landscape(pd2, degree = 1, exact = TRUE)
pl2 <- pl_delimit(pl2, xmin = 0, xmax = 2, xby = 0.1)
pl2_ <- pl_discretize(pl2)
Several infix operators have been taught to work in the natural way with landscapes, so that users can explore vector space operations and inner products more conveniently:
par(mfcol = c(3L, 2L), mar = c(2, 2, 0, 2))
# vector space operations on exact landscapes
plot(pl1 * 2)
plot(pl2)
plot(pl1 * 2 + pl2)
# vector space operations on discrete landscapes
plot(pl1_)
plot(-pl2_)
plot(2 * pl1_ - pl2_)
par(mfrow = c(1L, 1L), mar = c(5.1, 4.1, 4.1, 2.1))
# inner products of exact and discrete landscapes
pl1 %*% pl2
#> [1] 0.005336876
pl1_ %*% pl2_
#> [1] 0.004917171
pl1 %*% pl2_
#> [1] 0.004917171
(Note that the landscapes are automatically delimited to a compatible domain.)
The summary()
method above reported the magnitude and the integral of
the persistence landscape pl1
. The magnitude is the inner product of
pl1
with itself: pl1 %*% pl1 = 0.0026959
. Meanwhile, the integral is
the (signed) area under the curve, itself also a linear operator:
pl_integrate(pl1)
#> [1] 0.02952152
pl_integrate(pl2)
#> [1] 0.07295263
# 1-integral obeys linearity
pl_integrate(pl1) * 2 - pl_integrate(pl2)
#> [1] -0.01390959
pl_integrate(pl1 * 2 - pl2)
#> [1] -0.01390959
The distance between two landscapes is defined in terms of the integral
of their absolute difference for finite norms and the maximum pointwise
distance for the infinite norm. Note that, because pl_integrate()
defaults to the 1-norm and pl_distance()
defaults to the 2-norm, we
must be careful when comparing their results:
# using the 1-norm
pl_integrate(pl_abs(pl1 * 2 - pl2), p = 1)
#> [1] 0.03560593
pl_distance(pl1 * 2, pl2, p = 1)
#> [1] 0.03560593
# using the 2-norm
pl_integrate(pl_abs(pl1 * 2 - pl2), p = 2) ^ (1/2)
#> [1] 0.05041889
pl_distance(pl1 * 2, pl2, p = 2)
#> [1] 0.05041889
# using the infinity norm
pl_vmax(pl_abs(pl1 * 2 - pl2))
#> [1] 0.1178478 0.1265879
pl_distance(pl1 * 2, pl2, p = Inf)
#> [1] 0.1265879
The norm of a persistence landscape is then defined as its distance from the null landscape that is constant at zero.
# null landscape
pd0 <- data.frame(start = double(0L), end = double(0L))
pl0 <- landscape(pd0, degree = 1, exact = TRUE)
pl_distance(pl1, pl0)
#> [1] 0.05192161
pl_norm(pl1)
#> [1] 0.05192161
Finally, plt implements the two hypothesis tests described in the original paper. To illustrate, we first generate lists of landscapes for samples from two spaces:
# samples of landscapes from lemniscates
pl1s <- replicate(6, {
pc <- tdaunif::sample_lemniscate_gerono(60, sd = .1)
pd <- ripserr::vietoris_rips(pc, dim = 1, threshold = 2, p = 2)
landscape(pd, degree = 1, xby = .01)
})
#> Warning in vietoris_rips.matrix(pc, dim = 1, threshold = 2, p = 2): `dim`
#> parameter has been deprecated; use `max_dim` instead.
#> Warning in vietoris_rips.matrix(pc, dim = 1, threshold = 2, p = 2): `dim`
#> parameter has been deprecated; use `max_dim` instead.
#> Warning in vietoris_rips.matrix(pc, dim = 1, threshold = 2, p = 2): `dim`
#> parameter has been deprecated; use `max_dim` instead.
#> Warning in vietoris_rips.matrix(pc, dim = 1, threshold = 2, p = 2): `dim`
#> parameter has been deprecated; use `max_dim` instead.
#> Warning in vietoris_rips.matrix(pc, dim = 1, threshold = 2, p = 2): `dim`
#> parameter has been deprecated; use `max_dim` instead.
#> Warning in vietoris_rips.matrix(pc, dim = 1, threshold = 2, p = 2): `dim`
#> parameter has been deprecated; use `max_dim` instead.
# samples of landscapes from circles
pl2s <- replicate(8, {
pc <- tdaunif::sample_circle(60, sd = .1) / 2
pd <- ripserr::vietoris_rips(pc, dim = 1, threshold = 2, p = 2)
landscape(pd, degree = 1, xby = .01)
})
#> Warning in vietoris_rips.matrix(pc, dim = 1, threshold = 2, p = 2): `dim`
#> parameter has been deprecated; use `max_dim` instead.
#> Warning in vietoris_rips.matrix(pc, dim = 1, threshold = 2, p = 2): `dim`
#> parameter has been deprecated; use `max_dim` instead.
#> Warning in vietoris_rips.matrix(pc, dim = 1, threshold = 2, p = 2): `dim`
#> parameter has been deprecated; use `max_dim` instead.
#> Warning in vietoris_rips.matrix(pc, dim = 1, threshold = 2, p = 2): `dim`
#> parameter has been deprecated; use `max_dim` instead.
#> Warning in vietoris_rips.matrix(pc, dim = 1, threshold = 2, p = 2): `dim`
#> parameter has been deprecated; use `max_dim` instead.
#> Warning in vietoris_rips.matrix(pc, dim = 1, threshold = 2, p = 2): `dim`
#> parameter has been deprecated; use `max_dim` instead.
#> Warning in vietoris_rips.matrix(pc, dim = 1, threshold = 2, p = 2): `dim`
#> parameter has been deprecated; use `max_dim` instead.
#> Warning in vietoris_rips.matrix(pc, dim = 1, threshold = 2, p = 2): `dim`
#> parameter has been deprecated; use `max_dim` instead.
An inspection of the mean landscapes makes clear that they are distinct:
# average landscape from each sample
par(mfcol = c(2L, 1L), mar = c(2, 2, 0, 2))
plot(pl_mean(pl1s))
plot(pl_mean(pl2s))
par(mfrow = c(1L, 1L), mar = c(5.1, 4.1, 4.1, 2.1))
However, the two hypothesis tests use different procedures and rely on
different test statistics, so one may be more effective than another.
For convenience, both methods return objects of class 'htest'
for
convenient printing:
# z-test of difference in integrals of first level
pl_z_test(pl1s, pl2s)
#>
#> z-test
#>
#> data:
#> z = -2.3584, df = 12, p-value = 0.9908
#> alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0
#> 95 percent confidence interval:
#> -0.06283511 -0.01120004
#> sample estimates:
#> mean of x mean of y
#> 0.02664640 0.06366397
# permutation test of pairwise distances between landscapes
pl_perm_test(pl1s, pl2s)
#>
#> permutation test
#>
#> data:
#> p-value < 2.2e-16
#> alternative hypothesis: true distance between mean landscapes is greater than 0
#> sample estimates:
#> distance between mean landscapes
#> 0.06631177
The C++ library is adapted from Paweł Dłotko’s Persistence Landscape Toolbox. It was originally adapted and ported to R in Jose Bouza’s tda-tools package.
Development of this package benefitted from the use of equipment and the support of colleagues at the University of Florida, especially Peter Bubenik’s research group and the Laboratory for Systems Medicine.
Bug reports, unit tests, documentation, use cases, feature suggestions, and other contributions are welcome. See the CONTRIBUTING file for guidance, and please respect the Code of Conduct.
If you use plt in published work, please include a citation
following citation("plt")
.
[^1]: Bubenik P (2015) “Statistical Topological Data Analysis using Persistence Landscapes”. Journal of Machine Learning Research 16(3):77–102. https://jmlr.csail.mit.edu/papers/v16/bubenik15a.html
[^2]: Bubenik P & Dłotko P (2017) “A persistence landscapes toolbox for topological statistics”. Journal of Symbolic Computation 78(1):91–114. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747717116300104