issues
search
cyclestreets
/
tflcid-conversion
Conversion of TfL CID attributes to OSM
https://bikedata.cyclestreets.net/tflcid/conversion/
11
stars
3
forks
source link
issues
Newest
Newest
Most commented
Recently updated
Oldest
Least commented
Least recently updated
Replace continuous=yes + sidewalk=yes with highway=crossing
#52
rskedgell
opened
1 year ago
2
Import abandoned?
#51
rskedgell
opened
1 year ago
2
Incorrect location for traffic hump
#50
RedAuburn
opened
1 year ago
1
duplicate in the TFL Database
#49
RedAuburn
closed
1 year ago
2
Is it possible to raise a warning where a conflated node is attached to a building?
#48
rskedgell
closed
1 year ago
2
oneway=no is not really needed, unless actually needed
#47
matkoniecz
closed
2 years ago
1
bridges may be partially steps
#46
matkoniecz
closed
2 years ago
1
No Vehicles -> access=no, bicycle=yes
#45
matkoniecz
closed
2 years ago
1
walk=yes -> foot=yes
#44
matkoniecz
closed
2 years ago
3
"Community consultation needed for proposed new tag" remains for some
#43
matkoniecz
closed
2 years ago
5
use incline=up/down if provided by data
#42
matkoniecz
closed
2 years ago
3
Addition of ref:GB:tflcid ID
#41
mvl22
closed
1 year ago
6
Make import edit summary and attribution clearer
#40
ghost
closed
2 years ago
5
What is the license of photos at bikedata.cyclestreets.net/tflcid ?
#39
matkoniecz
opened
3 years ago
5
Side road entry treatment - TRF_ENTRY (raised in some way including continuous footway)
#38
matkoniecz
closed
2 years ago
7
Cycle parking lockers - use of own lock or provided lock
#37
matkoniecz
closed
2 years ago
13
please do not spam useless fixme tags
#36
matkoniecz
closed
2 years ago
2
Conversion: amenity=bicycle_parking
#35
mvl22
closed
4 years ago
1
Access Times - clt_access - is it just on standalone objects?
#34
matkoniecz
closed
4 years ago
1
oneway:bicycle=no missing for clt_contra
#33
matkoniecz
closed
2 years ago
2
Bicycle lane color - surface:color is not suitable
#32
matkoniecz
closed
4 years ago
1
Consider linking OSM Wiki import page in the readme
#31
matkoniecz
closed
2 years ago
1
Cycle Lane/Track Priority (continuity) - CLT_PRIORI
#30
mvl22
closed
2 years ago
4
clt_parkr proposes adding bicycle=yes to highway=cycleway in rare cases
#29
matkoniecz
closed
2 years ago
4
Unclear "TRUE: highway=cycleway, cycleway=track"
#28
matkoniecz
closed
2 years ago
2
Incorrect "NB In OSM bicycle=no means no bringing a bicycle at all" claim?
#27
matkoniecz
closed
2 years ago
9
asl_position=right/left/center
#26
matkoniecz
closed
2 years ago
4
Bicycle dismount (UK 'cyclists dismount' sign)
#25
mvl22
closed
1 year ago
7
Bicycle early release traffic lights
#24
mvl22
closed
2 years ago
5
Hybrid (stepped) cycle track
#23
mvl22
closed
2 years ago
13
Mandatory/advisory cycle lane
#22
mvl22
closed
2 years ago
11
Secure cycle parking
#21
mvl22
closed
2 years ago
1
bicycle_parking=cyclehoop for circular ring attached to pole
#20
mvl22
closed
2 years ago
3
Cycle parking - lockers
#19
mvl22
closed
2 years ago
2
Stands, "M stands" and "P stands"
#18
mvl22
closed
2 years ago
4
Cycle parking: covered
#17
mvl22
closed
4 years ago
2
Side-road entry treatment
#16
mvl22
closed
2 years ago
3
Two-tier cycle parking
#15
mvl22
closed
2 years ago
3
Cycle parking on/off carriageway
#14
mvl22
closed
2 years ago
2
Use foot=yes not walk=yes
#13
RobJN
closed
2 years ago
1
trf_barier does not imply bollard
#12
RobJN
closed
2 years ago
3
opening hours proposal affects all traffic
#11
RobJN
closed
2 years ago
13
Cycle lane track colour field colours whole road
#10
RobJN
closed
2 years ago
5
color -> colour
#9
RobJN
closed
2 years ago
0
Addressing the "query" comment on crs_segreg
#8
RobJN
closed
2 years ago
2
Update schema.json
#7
RobJN
closed
2 years ago
0
Signal-Controlled Crossing (crs_signal) proposal conflicts existing tags
#6
RobJN
closed
2 years ago
2
Signal-Controlled Crossing (crs_signal) implies bicycle=yes
#5
RobJN
closed
2 years ago
1
Add link to TfL's guide
#3
RobJN
closed
4 years ago
2
Feeder lane in centre / on right / on left
#2
RobJN
closed
2 years ago
9
Next