shea256 proposed-bitlicense-regulations issues

shea256 / proposed-bitlicense-regulations

The Proposed BitLicense Regulations for The State of New York (Thanks to Patrick Murck for the idea + support to convert this to markdown)

28 stars 18 forks source link

issues

Newest

Newest Most commented Recently updated Oldest Least commented Least recently updated

Added link at top of master (fixed) proposal

#22 dabura667 opened 9 years ago
0
It is not clear how consumers and merchants are excluded from regulation

#21 cornwarecjp opened 9 years ago
3
New York Resident definition should be limited to being in state

#20 wendydnew closed 9 years ago
2
Requiring a Bitlicense for anyone who conducts business with someone who is currently located in the state of NY is overbearing.

#19 vogelito closed 9 years ago
5
"control" is too broad

#18 vogelito opened 9 years ago
18
Virtual currency accounts not active for 5 years cannot be deemed abandoned property

#17 vogelito closed 9 years ago
2
extending these requirements to affiliates is overbearing

#16 vogelito opened 9 years ago
1
I'm using the definition of resident as per Section 250(5) of the NYS Vehicle and Traffic Law. Requiring a Bitlicense for anyone who conducts business with someone who is currently located in the state of NY is overbearing

#15 vogelito closed 9 years ago
2
Onerous capital and ID requirement for wallet providers or anything with a wallet in it.

#14 thang2162 opened 9 years ago
5
Section 200.8b Licensee is required to retain profits in US-denominated assets

#13 munister closed 9 years ago
4
Exemption for services that do not control keys

#12 markdavidlamb opened 9 years ago
2
Exemption for miners and people running nodes

#11 markdavidlamb opened 9 years ago
0
Changing definition of Virtual Currency Business

#10 markdavidlamb opened 9 years ago
2
Split Virtual Currency definition into "Centralized Virtual Currency and "Decentralized Virtual Currency"

#9 markdavidlamb opened 9 years ago
0
Fingerprinting should not be required of employees

#8 markdavidlamb opened 9 years ago
0
Deleting Satoshi clause

#7 markdavidlamb opened 9 years ago
0
Remove USD clause for retained earnings

#6 markdavidlamb closed 9 years ago
1
Update README.md

#5 jkirkby91 opened 9 years ago
1
Section 200.2 (n)(1, 5): clarify the role of miners

#4 dexX7 opened 9 years ago
0
Licensing process is open ended, completely at the whim of the superintendent

#3 gandrewstone opened 9 years ago
1
200.4 (5.i): fingerprinting

#2 gandrewstone opened 9 years ago
2
Everything which is not forbidden is allowed

#1 gandrewstone opened 9 years ago
3