twitter innovators-patent-agreement issues

twitter / innovators-patent-agreement

Innovators Patent Agreement (IPA)

921 stars 129 forks source link

issues

Newest

Newest Most commented Recently updated Oldest Least commented Least recently updated

ihiaalshar

#40 Aliihi closed 2 years ago
0
Update README.md

#39 ghost opened 8 years ago
1
Ambiguous what "promises" are referred to

#30 tieguy opened 10 years ago
1
Make substituted text consistent in styling and capitalization

#29 tieguy opened 10 years ago
2
Should inventor in "heirs of an inventor" sentence be capitalized?

#28 tieguy opened 10 years ago
0
Remove unused defined term "Agreement"

#27 tieguy opened 10 years ago
1
Clarify attribution requirement

#26 jboehmig closed 11 years ago
2
2(b)

#25 idmw opened 11 years ago
3
Updated status?

#24 tarul opened 11 years ago
4
Different approach to requiring inventor's to sublicense

#23 tarul opened 12 years ago
1
Has this been past a patent lawyer?

#22 digulla opened 12 years ago
4
moved paragraphs as requested

#21 egon010 opened 12 years ago
1
Fix Twitter's Standing to Sue

#20 jorgemtorres opened 12 years ago
1
Fix Twitter

#19 jorgemtorres closed 12 years ago
2
Is Inventors (and heirs) right to sublicense necessary?

#18 tarul opened 12 years ago
3
Maintain Inventor's right to authorize heir

#17 miketung opened 12 years ago
1
Public Disclosure of License

#16 JaredCrawford closed 12 years ago
3
Can we have clarification regarding what "Defensive" means?

#15 jrconlin closed 12 years ago
2
Make 2(b) use the definition of Defensive Purpose rather than providing a different definition of "defensively"

#14 joshtriplett opened 12 years ago
7
Merge inital changes, add further clarifications

#13 egon010 opened 12 years ago
1
Update innovators-patent-agreement.md with initial start at breach claus...

#12 egon010 opened 12 years ago
1
Patent Troll who copies to provoke patent infringement claim

#11 nicfulton opened 12 years ago
2
grammar fix

#10 adavies42 closed 12 years ago
0
Inventors, or inventors, their successors, assignees, etc?

#9 stephan-buckmaster opened 12 years ago
3
Needs more semicolons

#8 timyip closed 12 years ago
3
Son (or Daughter) of Twitter

#7 DavePitinga opened 12 years ago
3
Added a third party beneficiary clause

#6 JaredCrawford closed 12 years ago
1
Resale of patent rights is neither forbidden nor protected

#5 jamesarosen closed 12 years ago
8
I think the solution is elsewhere: treat ALL patents as RANDR by requirement of law.

#4 BrazilianJoe opened 12 years ago
2
What happens upon the death of inventor?

#3 nehresma closed 12 years ago
2
2(b) defines "defensively" differently; should use the same definition

#2 joshtriplett opened 12 years ago
4
Section 2(a) unnecessarily uses term "intellectual property"

#1 mdekstrand opened 12 years ago
1