issues
search
twitter
/
innovators-patent-agreement
Innovators Patent Agreement (IPA)
921
stars
129
forks
source link
issues
Newest
Newest
Most commented
Recently updated
Oldest
Least commented
Least recently updated
ihiaalshar
#40
Aliihi
closed
2 years ago
0
Update README.md
#39
ghost
opened
8 years ago
1
Ambiguous what "promises" are referred to
#30
tieguy
opened
10 years ago
1
Make substituted text consistent in styling and capitalization
#29
tieguy
opened
10 years ago
2
Should inventor in "heirs of an inventor" sentence be capitalized?
#28
tieguy
opened
10 years ago
0
Remove unused defined term "Agreement"
#27
tieguy
opened
10 years ago
1
Clarify attribution requirement
#26
jboehmig
closed
11 years ago
2
2(b)
#25
idmw
opened
11 years ago
3
Updated status?
#24
tarul
opened
11 years ago
4
Different approach to requiring inventor's to sublicense
#23
tarul
opened
12 years ago
1
Has this been past a patent lawyer?
#22
digulla
opened
12 years ago
4
moved paragraphs as requested
#21
egon010
opened
12 years ago
1
Fix Twitter's Standing to Sue
#20
jorgemtorres
opened
12 years ago
1
Fix Twitter
#19
jorgemtorres
closed
12 years ago
2
Is Inventors (and heirs) right to sublicense necessary?
#18
tarul
opened
12 years ago
3
Maintain Inventor's right to authorize heir
#17
miketung
opened
12 years ago
1
Public Disclosure of License
#16
JaredCrawford
closed
12 years ago
3
Can we have clarification regarding what "Defensive" means?
#15
jrconlin
closed
12 years ago
2
Make 2(b) use the definition of Defensive Purpose rather than providing a different definition of "defensively"
#14
joshtriplett
opened
12 years ago
7
Merge inital changes, add further clarifications
#13
egon010
opened
12 years ago
1
Update innovators-patent-agreement.md with initial start at breach claus...
#12
egon010
opened
12 years ago
1
Patent Troll who copies to provoke patent infringement claim
#11
nicfulton
opened
12 years ago
2
grammar fix
#10
adavies42
closed
12 years ago
0
Inventors, or inventors, their successors, assignees, etc?
#9
stephan-buckmaster
opened
12 years ago
3
Needs more semicolons
#8
timyip
closed
12 years ago
3
Son (or Daughter) of Twitter
#7
DavePitinga
opened
12 years ago
3
Added a third party beneficiary clause
#6
JaredCrawford
closed
12 years ago
1
Resale of patent rights is neither forbidden nor protected
#5
jamesarosen
closed
12 years ago
8
I think the solution is elsewhere: treat ALL patents as RANDR by requirement of law.
#4
BrazilianJoe
opened
12 years ago
2
What happens upon the death of inventor?
#3
nehresma
closed
12 years ago
2
2(b) defines "defensively" differently; should use the same definition
#2
joshtriplett
opened
12 years ago
4
Section 2(a) unnecessarily uses term "intellectual property"
#1
mdekstrand
opened
12 years ago
1