issues
search
w3c-ccg
/
did-spec
Please see README.md for latest version being developed by W3C DID WG.
https://w3c.github.io/did-core/
Other
124
stars
45
forks
source link
issues
Newest
Newest
Most commented
Recently updated
Oldest
Least commented
Least recently updated
[Validating the draft DID] Which version of the ABNF specification should be referenced in the final did-spec?
#176
mwherman2000
closed
4 years ago
3
[Validating the DID ABNF] Is there an online validator we can agree to use to objectively validate the DID ABNF against a set of DID URL test/use cases?
#175
mwherman2000
closed
5 years ago
5
[DID Subject] Clarification: What is the term for a Person or Organization that doesn't have a DID Document stored on the VDR?
#174
mwherman2000
closed
5 years ago
10
Editorial and structure
#173
rhiaro
closed
5 years ago
0
(Partially) Encrypting DID Documents
#172
RieksJ
closed
4 years ago
12
[DID ABNF] How can we support DID Resolution requirements like `did:?ping` and `did:?methods`?
#171
mwherman2000
closed
5 years ago
10
Inconsistent ABNF and related definitions
#170
jandrieu
closed
5 years ago
52
Does the did-spec need to be specific about which parts of the URI RFC it is conformant with?
#169
mwherman2000
closed
4 years ago
8
Refactor ABNF rules for DIDs and DID References.
#168
dmitrizagidulin
closed
4 years ago
10
Should the definition of a DID Reference be moved to the DID Resolution spec?
#167
mwherman2000
closed
5 years ago
14
make publicKey section more explicit for understanding of DIDs reliance on public keys
#166
kdenhartog
closed
4 years ago
38
Rename "cryptographic suites" to verification methods.
#165
dlongley
closed
5 years ago
2
Initial refactor
#164
rhiaro
closed
5 years ago
0
[References] What is the current URL for the URL spec we should be referencing?
#163
mwherman2000
closed
5 years ago
1
Clarify PubKey section
#162
rhiaro
closed
5 years ago
2
JSON Pointer issue 86
#161
rhiaro
closed
5 years ago
0
All methods must have a name of at least 3 characters
#160
TomCJones
closed
5 years ago
8
Updates to URIs, URLs, and URNs section
#159
mwherman2000
closed
5 years ago
8
[Overall Scope] What is considered Normative (and in-scope), Informative (and in-scope) and just plain out of scope?
#158
mwherman2000
closed
5 years ago
4
[Introduction] Is the Purpose of the Draft DID spec clear and correct? Is there a defined Target Audience for the document...
#157
mwherman2000
closed
4 years ago
2
[URIs, URLs, and URNs] "DIDs have a foundation in URLs" is confusing because DIDs aren't URLs
#156
mwherman2000
closed
5 years ago
3
[URIs, URLs, and URNs] Section doesn't conclude with a precise declaration of what a DID is.
#155
mwherman2000
closed
5 years ago
6
[Design Goals] Vague references to "entities" need to be clarified
#154
mwherman2000
closed
5 years ago
1
Support "controller" at the top-level of a DID Document
#153
dlongley
closed
4 years ago
8
publicKeyJwk, publicKeyHex, publicKeyBase64, publicKeyBase58 missing from context.
#152
OR13
closed
4 years ago
5
[Extensibility] references the formal concept of the Decentralized Identifiers Data Model but there is nothing in the document with this formal name/concept
#151
mwherman2000
closed
5 years ago
26
"distributed ledger" and "ledger" used randomly (in place of one-and-other)
#150
mwherman2000
closed
5 years ago
2
[Authorization and Delegation] Is this sentence correct if there is no requirement to use a Ledger?
#149
mwherman2000
closed
5 years ago
1
[Authentication] Is Authentication the correct mechanism for specifying the ownership of a Thing?
#148
mwherman2000
closed
4 years ago
10
[DID Operations] "all the operations required of a CKMS" are not specified on the body of this section
#147
mwherman2000
closed
4 years ago
1
Implement js package.
#146
mattcollier
closed
5 years ago
0
[Authentication] First sentence is confusing
#145
mwherman2000
closed
5 years ago
2
[Authentication] introduces the concept of a DID Description which is neither defined or referenced elsewhere in the draft spec
#144
mwherman2000
closed
5 years ago
1
[Public Keys] re: referenced keys: Is multiple level recursion allowed?
#143
mwherman2000
closed
4 years ago
3
[Public Keys] What about when a DID Entity is a Thing ...and not an Actor?
#142
mwherman2000
closed
5 years ago
7
[DID Documents] Is the the second sentence is true/correct? [No]
#141
mwherman2000
closed
5 years ago
0
[DID Documents]: Opening sentence is confusing
#140
mwherman2000
closed
4 years ago
6
[DID Subject] The concept of the DID Subject is redundant, confuding,and I believe unnecessary
#139
mwherman2000
closed
5 years ago
7
Make clear which sections of the spec are normative
#138
TomCJones
closed
5 years ago
3
[FRAGMENTS] Confuding statement needs to be reworded....
#137
mwherman2000
closed
5 years ago
6
[The Generic DID Scheme] ABNF definitions for did-path and did-fragment are missing from the draft specification
#136
mwherman2000
closed
5 years ago
1
[Specific DID Method Schemes] Names of "ABNF rules" not named consistently (capitalization)
#135
mwherman2000
closed
5 years ago
1
[Specific DID Method Schemes] Reference to "The fully qualified DID" ...not necessary
#134
mwherman2000
closed
5 years ago
1
[Specific DID Method Schemes] Very, very confuding non-recommendation for central registries needs to be removed
#133
mwherman2000
closed
4 years ago
10
[The Generic DID Scheme] References are not referred to consistently e.g. "[RFC3986]" .vs "[URI]"
#132
mwherman2000
closed
5 years ago
5
[The Generic DID Scheme] The language in this section contradicts the previous language in the Terminology section
#131
mwherman2000
closed
4 years ago
6
[TITLE] Is the title of this draft specification correct/precise?
#130
mwherman2000
closed
5 years ago
3
[TERMINOLOGY] The definition (the specific wording) of/for DID Scheme is confuding.
#129
mwherman2000
closed
5 years ago
1
[TERMINOLOGY] The definition of a DID Reference omits the need for the punctuation character
#128
mwherman2000
closed
5 years ago
1
[TERMINOLOGY] DID Method - overloading issues - Representations of DID Documents are written to the Ledger. ...not DIDs. ...misuse of "DID"
#127
mwherman2000
closed
5 years ago
9
Previous
Next