-
While putting in a new complex term for @bmeldal, I noticed that there is some inconsistency with the location of the xrefs to IntAct IDs. There are over 200 hits for the string "IntAct:EBI", sometime…
-
**EDITED**
Hello,
'GO:0090079 translation regulator activity, nucleic acid binding' has a single protein annotated, SGD DHH1. http://amigo.geneontology.org/amigo/gene_product/SGD:S000002319
…
-
1. transcription factor activity, sequence-specific DNA binding -> transcription factor activity
- Ditto subclasses
2. transcription factor activity, protein binding -> transcription regulator acti…
-
Following up on #15536
>The current definition of 'GO:0003712 transcription cofactor activity' states that 'cofactors mediate protein-protein interactions between regulatory transcription factors a…
-
hello,
For the Transcription refactoring, I will
* move 'GO:0003712 transcription cofactor activity' as a direct child of 'GO:0140110 transcription regulator activity' (instead of the current '…
-
Could you make a parent term "transcription factor activity"
children-
GO:0001071 nucleic acid binding transcription factor activity
GO:0000989 transcription factor activity, transcription facto…
-
_From @dosumis on October 28, 2015 13:46_
_From @dosumis on August 28, 2015 9:56_
We currently have patterns like this:
- molecular_function that ('has part' some 'nucleic acid binding') and ('part …
-
Rename 'GO:0001181 transcription factor activity, core RNA polymerase I binding'
-> general RNA polymerase I cofactor activity
and move under transcription cofactor activity.
- Single EXP annot…
-
Dear all,
The proposal has been made to obsolete 'GO:0061777 DNA clamp activity'. The reason for obsoletion is that the term captures the structure of the complex when bound to the DNA, not a spec…
-
Currently both subsets ( gocheck_do_not_annotate and gocheck_do_not_manually_annotate)
are treated the same way; but it should be:
* gocheck_do_not_annotate -> never allowed
* gocheck_do_not_manu…