-
Current layer claims that everything is licensed under MIT and copyrighted by
Copyright (c) 2012, BMW Car IT GmbH
Copyright (c) 2018-2020 LG Electronics, Inc.
That is not the case as over the pas…
-
Hello @gafr!
First of all, I have to say, awesome work with your trained models—I love them!
I am opening this issue because I am working on a project at my startup, and our compliance team does…
-
**What Docs changes are you proposing?**
I want to add MIT License into this repository.
**Why do the Docs need this improvement? What is the motivation for this change? How will this change benef…
-
Hi,
we are noticing a lot of cases where packages are missing their licenses even though they can be found easily.
one of the examples for python packages is 'pydantic':
1. both on https://pypi.…
-
Hello WHAM Team,
I'm considering using the WHAM repository for a commercial project and I noticed that the repository is under the MIT License, which typically allows for such use. However, I have …
-
I'd really like to use your code in my company's paid product, but since you've not specified a license, the default applies, which is that you retain all rights to it. Is this what you intended? If n…
-
[SPDX license expressions](https://spdx.github.io/spdx-spec/v2-draft/SPDX-license-expressions/) are strings that might look like "MIT OR LicenseRef-MyOwnLicense". As much as I figured, this would have…
-
Hi team,
I noticed that following this [PR](https://github.com/microsoft/vscode-vsce/pull/994), this package (`@vscode/vsce`, MIT licensed) now depends on `@vscode/vsce-sign` which is under the Mic…
hador updated
6 hours ago
-
The LICENSE file states MIT, while `package.json` declares "ISC". This confuses license-checking tools like license-checker.
-
I have dependency-review setup to deny a whole slew of licenses:
```
fail-on-severity: high
comment-summary-in-pr: never
warn-only: true
license-check: true
deny-licenses:
- Abstyles
- …