-
Per aim 1 of R24 [here](Add cross-species connections between these ontologies, allowing machine processing of model organism data for elucidating human phenotypes), but I'm not sure what it is we are…
-
The phenotype ontologies make the same classic mistake used by GO originally, in assuming CHEBI follows a biologist-friendly nomenclature. It does not. We are now undergoing an expensive refactor.
…
-
We need some documentation about how to interpret data on our site. This easily lends itself to a FAQ. I think the FAQ should be broken up into several parts based on the primary data that can be ex…
-
Per aim 1 of R24 renewal [here](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s5waFXyzyYz8oZe6MYZ4WwTb1BzdTgki-PiQ7JTmRfE/edit)
-
I am trying to consolidate relevant ontologies that model anything related to cognition and behaviour, such as Mammalian Phenotype, GO, MFOEM, Drosophila Phenotype and more.
Based on probably the…
-
_From @mellybelly on June 13, 2016 15:35_
We can leverage work across the two ontologies if we examine synonym discrepancies for equivalent classes.
@cmungall @drseb @balhoff
_Copied from origin…
-
This issue is related to DOSDP phenotype pattern
[Irregular density of anatomical entity](https://github.com/obophenotype/upheno/issues/797) utilising [PATO:0002141 irregular density](https://www.eb…
-
Hi @ValWood I am annotating now klp2 cellular component to microtubule plus ends. Within GO, can we indicate that this localization depends on another protein (in this case mal3), or does this belong …
-
Thus far, most phenotype ontologies have focused on abnormal phenotypes, often refined with qualitative assertions about whether an abnormality involves higher or lower levels of some phenotypic quali…
-