-
-
## Bug report
### Expected behavior and actual behavior
Expected: no errors during the staging of files
Actual: in roughly 30% of the cases I get the error with the output below
### Steps t…
-
https://www.dropbox.com/s/xh1ehqsk42skb6w/Screenshot%202020-06-23%2014.38.16.png
https://github.com/bigbio/proteomics-metadata-standard/blob/master/templates/sdrf-human.tsv
vs
https://github.com/…
-
https://github.com/bigbio/proteomics-metadata-standard/blob/master/annotated-projects/PXD000312/sdrf.tsv
This project the PTMs are wrongly annotated because the user used excel and the AC increase …
-
@levitsky @anjaf @daichengxin :
While technical replicate is annotated always as a comment, the biological replicate is annotated sometimes as comment other as characteristics. See example here ht…
-
Annotating PXD009203 I nearly caused an accidental de-anonymization:
In the paper the individuals are mostly statistically aggregated. In supplemental table 1 nevertheless the study cohort is charac…
-
In the PMID: 25043054 experiment, three softwares were used to identify the peptides, and the parameter settings for each were different, as follows:
> Pepitome and MyriMatch used precursor toleran…
-
We need to update the CI/CD in order to be able to validate PRs that contains sdrf changes or additions.
A prototype of the CI/CD has been built in CircleCI but is not working properly. Related is…
-
https://github.com/bigbio/proteomics-metadata-standard/blob/f183deb3bb224852e6b8e35fcb9a70cfb7757244/annotated-projects/PXD004683/sdrf.tsv
This experiment is wrong. In TMT experiment each sample sh…
-
I tried going through the annotated datasets with [sdrf-pipelines](https://github.com/bigbio/sdrf-pipelines) validator. On some of them, it breaks with a traceback, and on others it shows error messag…