-
This issue is opened for the code reviews by the team members of the morning session.
-
- Your code works correctly! It meets all the requirements of the project, maybe you could have structured the modules a bit more... like dividing each functionality of the scores into a different mod…
-
## 🎖️ Good work on implementing the requirements on your app. You have implemented most of the task
👨💻 highlights
✔️ Modules being used
✔️ Functional choices are exceptional
### Suggestions t…
-
# APCA Review Status
Per the [Contrast Subgroup](https://github.com/w3c/wcag3/wiki/color-contrast-guideline-subgroup):
>..._The research and resulting algorithm requires extensive peer review from o…
-
Hi Jay.
First of all, good job on the project so far, it looks very similar to the template you have chosen.
However, here are some issues you should work on:
- The space between the last work …
-
**Hi dd-obua,**
Good job so far
There are some issues that still need to work on.
- We suggest you remove the a-tags around the welcome image in lines 22-24 in the index.html file because it is n…
-
Via https://github.com/ropensci/comtradr/issues/45
A package will be extensively re-written and after that submitted again for peer-review.
In the meantime is it fine to "claim" the software-rev…
-
# Osman Review
#David Review
-
-
Highlights!
Good feature branch name ✔️
Descriptive pull request ✔️
Descriptive commit messages ✔️
Good code organization and working app ✔️
Your commits are often that is great practice.
I th…