-
The list of groups on the landing page reflects what is in the groups.yaml file, but that yaml file contains a number of groups that likely do not have annotations in GO nor will ever create GO-CAM mo…
-
I used the "directness" qualifier, I always select "direct", but this resolves in the pathway diagram as dotted lines instead of solid lines.
-
The table view is showing redundant information for models, as well as relations and inferences that we don't want to see.
For this very basic model:
![image](https://user-images.githubuserconte…
-
From identifiers.org: UniProt:P04202 and https://identifiers.org/UniProt:P04202
In our go-cams: UniProtKB:P04202 and http://identifiers.org/uniprot/Q16629
[Example in Noctua-models](https://githu…
-
Model on right ([MOT2](http://noctua.geneontology.org/editor/graph/gomodel:SGD_S000000870)) was edited by SGD curators, model on left ([CDC20](http://noctua.geneontology.org/editor/graph/gomodel:SGD_S…
-
On discussion, closing this ticket would be:
- [ ] listing all external traffic coming in to noctua, barista, and minerva
- [ ] creating a ticket/plan for each separate source or strategy
-
We're using, e.g. http://identifiers.org/wormbase/WBGene00000001, however this doesn't resolve. Biolink model is using https://identifiers.org/wb/WBGene00000001, which does resolve. Changing this woul…
-
For creation of GPAD2.0 file for manual WB annotations housed at Caltech:
- [x] Add 'located in' and 'acts upstream of or within' to allowed relation values in OA table gop_qualifier
- [x] Conf…
-
sometimes, I cannot import existing annotations, although I can see them, and select them, they do not appear in the activity unit?
this is happening for me now on
http://noctua.geneontology.…
-
The following are not necessarily wrong, just observations of differences. cc @balhoff @kltm
* [x] Ontology IRI not provided
* [ ] No import declaration
* [ ] Injects TBox and RBox declaratio…