authindicators rfc-brand-indicators-for-message-identification issues

authindicators / rfc-brand-indicators-for-message-identification

Other

19 stars 6 forks source link

issues

Newest

Newest Most commented Recently updated Oldest Least commented Least recently updated

Fix spelling

#32 lieser closed 9 months ago
0
Remove bimi-sep from bimi-indicator-header definition

#31 marcbradshaw closed 1 year ago
0
Fix AR headers to follow spec

#30 marcbradshaw closed 1 year ago
0
Formal definition of bimi-indicator-header wrong?

#29 lieser closed 1 year ago
0
Authentication-Results examples in appendix are invalid

#28 lieser closed 1 year ago
0
Reference to [URI] is missing

#27 lieser opened 1 year ago
0
Policy indicator uri

#26 marcbradshaw closed 1 year ago
0
Change "declination"

#25 abrotman opened 1 year ago
0
Typo in draft-brand-indicators-for-message-identification

#24 toddherr closed 1 year ago
1
ABNF Upates

#23 toddherr closed 1 year ago
1
Selector used with failed DKIM?

#22 abrotman opened 3 years ago
0
Example BIMI Headers Construction

#21 lieser opened 3 years ago
0
Added description of full DMARC implementation

#20 toddherr closed 4 months ago
0
Consistent zip

#19 marcbradshaw closed 4 years ago
0
Update dmarc requirements

#18 marcbradshaw closed 4 years ago
0
status

#17 dennislabela opened 4 years ago
1
Feature/svg slim

#16 AntiFreeze closed 5 years ago
0
Feature/svg only

#15 AntiFreeze closed 5 years ago
0
Tracking users with BIMI selectors

#14 massar opened 6 years ago
0
Policy is not-cacheable

#13 massar opened 6 years ago
0
How useful is BIMI? -> Local Policy defines if "Logo" is shown...

#12 massar closed 4 years ago
0
Not a draft yet at the IETF, please publish for peer review

#11 massar closed 4 years ago
0
IETF status?

#10 vanderlee closed 6 years ago
2
Need IANA Considerations section for Auth-Results extension

#9 AntiFreeze closed 4 years ago
0
Location tag is required even when declining to publish

#8 AntiFreeze closed 4 years ago
0
Seth edits 2017 03 27

#7 AntiFreeze closed 7 years ago
0
modified example for BIMI-Location header construction flow

#6 Lockhead closed 7 years ago
1
Considerations: Vector vs Raster

#5 abrotman closed 7 years ago
2
Seth edits 17 03 16

#4 AntiFreeze closed 7 years ago
0
Why DNS if it's only for mail?

#3 Lockhead closed 7 years ago
7
BIMI location in the message headers - guaranteed DKIM break

#2 Lockhead closed 7 years ago
3
Fix some syntax issues that were interfering with compilation.

#1 petergoldstein closed 7 years ago
0