dotnet-foundation project-maturity-model issues

dotnet-foundation / project-maturity-model

Proposal/RFC for new .NET library development model.

MIT License

39 stars 9 forks source link

issues

Newest

Newest Most commented Recently updated Oldest Least commented Least recently updated

Clarification

#50 matkoch opened 4 years ago
0
Announcement: Rethinking Project Maturity as a Community Process

#49 benaadams opened 5 years ago
3
Future .NET Foundation Initiatives

#48 Aaronontheweb closed 5 years ago
9
Rename "maturity model"

#47 dustinmoris opened 5 years ago
3
Semver versioning

#46 glennawatson opened 5 years ago
3
NET Coding guidelines requirement

#45 isaacabraham opened 5 years ago
8
Clear problem statement

#44 glennawatson opened 5 years ago
2
Give weight to other software foundations (e.g. CNCF, Apache)

#43 JamesNK opened 5 years ago
1
Add more information about the .NET Foundations independence

#42 glennawatson closed 5 years ago
0
Emphasise early on in the proposal that the .NET Foundation is not Microsoft

#41 glennawatson closed 5 years ago
0
Add concept of an appeal/review to the punitive sections

#40 glennawatson opened 5 years ago
0
Update readme not to reference ladders

#39 glennawatson closed 5 years ago
0
Change ladder to profiles, soften wording

#38 glennawatson closed 5 years ago
3
Process of evaluation and moving between tiers

#37 glennawatson closed 5 years ago
2
Add concept of an appeal/review to the punitive sections.

#36 glennawatson closed 5 years ago
2
Identity likely target consumer

#35 glennawatson opened 5 years ago
13
Existing policies

#34 glennawatson opened 5 years ago
1
How do tooling dependencies apply?

#33 daveaglick opened 5 years ago
2
Microsoft must not be in the business of telling users which open source is "good" or trustworthy

#32 Aaronontheweb closed 5 years ago
55
Onboard OpenRiaServices project

#31 Daniel-Svensson closed 3 years ago
1
Expand requirements with the reason why it is a good practice

#30 JamesNK opened 5 years ago
0
Public phone call

#29 glennawatson opened 5 years ago
1
Guidance around level 1 information requirements (contributing, versioning, roadmap)

#28 JamesNK opened 5 years ago
2
How should we minimize/eliminate negative impacts to projects that opt out?

#27 jongalloway opened 5 years ago
2
Reword ladder section to emphasise being lower down is fine

#26 glennawatson opened 5 years ago
17
Put the issue template instructions into a comment

#25 glennawatson closed 5 years ago
0
Clarify L3 community to include "related to" repo

#24 jongalloway closed 5 years ago
0
Plan for effectively scaling to handle increased service setup

#23 jongalloway opened 5 years ago
3
Question about level 3 acceptance re static analysis

#22 baronfel opened 5 years ago
3
Update policy process

#21 glennawatson opened 5 years ago
2
Commit Signing with GPG or SMIME?

#20 glennawatson opened 5 years ago
16
Add note on digitally signing

#19 jongalloway closed 5 years ago
0
Concerns with Code Signing Requirement

#18 mitchelsellers closed 5 years ago
3
Consider doing a video

#17 glennawatson opened 5 years ago
2
Is a licensing restriction really needed?

#16 daveaglick opened 5 years ago
7
Adding a projects document for terrafx.

#15 tannergooding closed 4 years ago
7
Concerns with the Project Maturity Model

#14 RLittlesII closed 5 years ago
17
Dispute resolution and support policies

#13 glennawatson opened 5 years ago
7
clarifying "Stable packages depends on libraries that are at level X"

#12 shiftkey opened 5 years ago
2
fix broken link

#11 shiftkey closed 5 years ago
1
"Member project of the .NET Foundation" at Level 3 - why?

#10 shiftkey opened 5 years ago
5
Feedback on the proposed model

#9 JamesRandall opened 5 years ago
38
Questions: The Bogus open-source project

#8 bchavez opened 5 years ago
3
Grammar fixes

#7 bchavez closed 5 years ago
0
Badge icons and NuGet

#6 clairernovotny opened 5 years ago
7
Creating project Alexa.NET

#5 timheuer closed 3 years ago
5
Program clarification

#4 HurricanKai opened 5 years ago
7
Maturity ladder relationship to community

#3 daveaglick closed 5 years ago
2
re: project forge feedback

#2 ghuntley opened 5 years ago
2
Uses MIT or other compatible license, and third party contributions are documented in a notice file.

#1 ghuntley opened 5 years ago
9