issues
search
tc39
/
proposal-intl-relative-time
`Intl.RelativeTimeFormat` specification [draft]
http://tc39.github.io/proposal-intl-relative-time/
215
stars
24
forks
source link
issues
Newest
Newest
Most commented
Recently updated
Oldest
Least commented
Least recently updated
request New API for format relative time from now
#118
hanguokai
opened
3 years ago
5
It would be nice to document the expected placeables in the pattern.
#116
zbraniecki
closed
4 years ago
5
Editorial: Fixing PartitionRelativeTimePattern preamble
#115
caiolima
closed
4 years ago
0
Fix MakePartsList algorithm
#114
longlho
closed
4 years ago
4
Add an option to remove the prefix
#113
VincentCharpentier
closed
5 years ago
2
"Polyfills" section: comparison table. Closes #111
#112
catamphetamine
closed
4 years ago
40
Ambiguous Polyfills section in docs
#111
catamphetamine
closed
4 years ago
2
Add more polyfill links
#110
longlho
closed
5 years ago
2
Reorder
#109
FrankYFTang
closed
5 years ago
1
Normative: Add numberingSystem option bag entry
#108
littledan
closed
5 years ago
3
Add missing `now` result
#107
koddsson
closed
5 years ago
1
Accept BigInt in format/formatToParts
#106
FrankYFTang
closed
5 years ago
2
Handle cut-off logic / distance with a given Date
#105
damianobarbati
closed
5 years ago
5
Update README.md
#104
romulocintra
closed
5 years ago
0
Update status on README
#103
benmccann
closed
5 years ago
0
Docs(MDN) : Intl.RelativeTimeFormat
#102
romulocintra
closed
5 years ago
9
Added polyfill link to README
#101
catamphetamine
closed
5 years ago
0
Add NumberingSystem to resolvedOptions
#100
FrankYFTang
closed
5 years ago
1
Add "nu" as RelevantExtensionKeys
#99
FrankYFTang
closed
5 years ago
3
Update Readme examples
#98
romulocintra
closed
5 years ago
2
Editorial: Fix editorial nits
#97
anba
closed
5 years ago
0
Allow to modify the numbering system through "nu"?
#96
anba
closed
5 years ago
8
PartitionRelativeTimePattern accepts non-time values
#95
anba
closed
4 years ago
1
Editorial: Specify table order per https://github.com/tc39/ecma402/issues/264
#94
FrankYFTang
closed
5 years ago
2
Editorial: Fix title and id of the Resolved Options table.
#93
Ms2ger
closed
5 years ago
0
Add V8 implementation
#92
mathiasbynens
closed
5 years ago
1
Incorrect "yesterday" examples
#91
mathiasbynens
closed
4 years ago
6
Editorial: Fix various minor issues.
#90
Ms2ger
closed
5 years ago
0
Editorial: Avoid use of undefined isFinite abstract op
#89
littledan
closed
5 years ago
1
Review handling of "narrow" style
#88
Ms2ger
closed
6 years ago
6
Fix the id for MakePartsList to ensure it gets hyperlinked.
#87
Ms2ger
closed
6 years ago
0
isFinite() does not seem to be formally defined
#86
Ms2ger
closed
5 years ago
1
Editorial: resolvedOptions() things are never undefined
#85
littledan
closed
6 years ago
0
resolvedOptions does not need undefined check
#84
gsathya
closed
6 years ago
0
README/technical design: Add NumberFormat options
#83
rxaviers
closed
6 years ago
1
Question: What about other NumberFormat options?
#82
rxaviers
closed
6 years ago
2
Normative: Remove mistaken NumberFormat options
#81
littledan
closed
6 years ago
1
Question: why is minimumIntegerDigits set to 2?
#80
jungshik
closed
6 years ago
6
Create options objects with null prototype (fixes #76).
#79
Ms2ger
closed
6 years ago
1
Remove the references to [[InitializedIntlObject]] (fixes #75).
#78
Ms2ger
closed
6 years ago
2
Make @@toStringTag more useful (fixes #72).
#77
Ms2ger
closed
6 years ago
1
Create options objects with null proto
#76
gsathya
closed
6 years ago
1
Remove references to InitializedIntlObject
#75
gsathya
closed
6 years ago
3
Fix paragraph markup in the FormatRelativeTimeToParts section.
#74
Ms2ger
closed
6 years ago
0
"an optional argument value"
#73
Ms2ger
closed
6 years ago
1
Review @@toStringTag value
#72
Ms2ger
closed
6 years ago
1
Fix incorrect list markup.
#71
Ms2ger
closed
6 years ago
0
Normative: formatToParts breaks apart the number
#70
littledan
closed
6 years ago
1
Should formatToParts break down the inner NumberFormat?
#69
littledan
closed
6 years ago
1
Editorial: Consistently use "the this value"
#68
littledan
closed
6 years ago
0
Next