-
* pharokka version:1.7.3
* Python version:3.10.14
* Operating System: linux
### Description
Hi!
When running pharokka on meta mode it returns a funky error about duplication of key which look…
-
Thank you for the great tool! I am using MEGAHIT+VIBRANT+COBRA to get about 35 high-quality phages from each of my metagenomes after validation by CheckV. I just tested the new overlap-based assembler…
-
* pharokka version: 1.7.2
* Python version: 3.10.14
* Operating System: Ubuntu 20.04.3.LTS / Intel® Core™ i9-10980XE CPU @ 3.00GHz × 36 / 256 Gb RAM / NVIDIA Corporation GP108 [GeForce GT 1030]
#…
-
Hi!
I am currently using PhaGCN2.3.0 for phage classification. I have previously used PhaBOX on geNomad classified viral contigs with length filter of 3000 bp (I will later only take the prediction…
-
Greetings,
I have installed the Phamerator tool locally and it's working as expected but there are no phages available. My question; how can I load my phages and index it for Phamerator portal.
…
-
Hi, I was wondering why VIBRANT doesn't output the taxonomic identities of predicted phages (should they be not novel ones)? In case VIBRANT does this, where can I find this info in the output?
-
Hi, Christian
I'm currently delving into the domain of _Providencia_ and _Klebsiella pneumoniae_ phages. Would you be interested in creating models?
Additionally, while PHASTER offers commendabl…
-
Dear authors! Thank you for the program. Is it possible to realize identification of eukaryotic viruses from contigs bypassing assembly?
-
Hi,
I ran VIBRANT (version 1.2.1) on two bacterial genome sequences known to have phages as predicted with Virsorter2 and other tools, but the output from VIBRANT shows no phages. How do I troubles…
-
Hi,
I ran VIBRANT on about 90 .fna files, on a few of them the log file (DSM_10166_173_fasta.log) says 0 phages were found, but in the DSM_10166_173_fasta.phages_combined.txt, it lists two names. T…