-
During development (and possibly later as well), development will be made based on a ticket board
Each user gets access to this ticket board, where they can add things they want implemented
Then t…
-
### Description
* **Goal:**
* **Why here?:**
\*
1.
In Social Choice/Epistemic Democracy there is a concept called Objective Truth, that refers to the “right” allocation that should ideally b…
-
**Current behavior**
In an ongoing voting process, it is possible to switch voting weighting or the transfer of voting rights on or off. This is a problem as manipulation is theoretically possible, a…
MSoeb updated
2 months ago
-
As organizer, I want to control when the results are published, in order to have time to review it, validate them and/or announce them.
**Task:**
Add a new metadata field in all voting process, …
-
Feedback from Steven:
"....asking voters to approve of all candidates they like leaves matters a bit ambiguous, because "like" is not clear. In previous work, we have asked voters to vote for all can…
-
DAOs may want to derive voting power from multiple different sources. Maybe they want both token and NFT governance tokens, or consistent members and fluid token membership, or two different token typ…
-
I think this might be similar to the other error relating to AWS, I'm not certain. This has been reported multiple times. I heard from a dev that works w Zama stack directly that Zama patched this, bu…
-
# Lines of code
# Vulnerability details
The change addresses the findings [Malicious proposals can be executed in the Governance](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-07-reserve-findings/issues/17)…
-
### Description
* **Goal:** Measure how well the voting design represents the preference of the majority of voter preferences
* **Why here?:**
* If OP Retro Funding, the voting should reflect the m…
-
# Lines of code
# Vulnerability details
All the mitigations in this report are correct.
Previously, malicious `proposals` could be executed when the `era` changed just before `voting` began.
To…