cjph8914 2020_benfords issues

cjph8914 / 2020_benfords

369 stars 83 forks source link

issues

Newest

Newest Most commented Recently updated Oldest Least commented Least recently updated

Strongest Evidence there was election fraud.

#42 chavenor opened 3 years ago
0
1,2,3 digit Benford plots for Texas (2020 to 1992 presidential elections) using county aggregated counts

#41 bd271828 opened 3 years ago
3
Starting and working on new repository

#40 bd271828 opened 3 years ago
0
Add a Way to Simulate an Election With Given Parameters

#39 snex opened 3 years ago
2
Election Fraud Data Check of Dr. Shiva

#38 chavenor opened 3 years ago
25
Data from multiple providers?

#37 tomdotcash opened 3 years ago
2
The average ward in Milwaukee has 750 votes, how would Biden have 100-200 in 30% of wards?

#36 dlb8685 opened 3 years ago
14
2BL test more appropiate for appropriate for election fraud

#35 Enclavet opened 3 years ago
2
I need a solution. Inforgot my passcode to iCloud, and I tried to guess Many times and now is activation lock. Helllpppppppp

#34 ghost closed 2 years ago
1
You might want to quantify the deviation of data from the Benford's law for each graph

#33 yurivict opened 3 years ago
0
Breakdown by vote type

#32 snex opened 3 years ago
8
Why is the Biden Election Day vote data nearly Gaussian ?

#31 charlesmartin14 opened 3 years ago
29
Benfords law regarding election data needs to use the second digit analysis

#30 tehmikey opened 3 years ago
1
Updated README.md

#29 prantaneel opened 3 years ago
0
Time series analysis?

#28 1e100 closed 1 year ago
9
Allegheny, PA absentee votes, second digit

#27 ghost opened 3 years ago
24
For comparison...

#26 MatthiasWinkelmann opened 3 years ago
0
Allow arbitrary bases for Benford's Law Graphs

#25 jimmysong opened 3 years ago
0
I added benford statistical tests & updated README.md for better explainations.

#24 ghost opened 3 years ago
6
I added Benford chi-squared statistical tests and updated the README.md file

#23 ghost closed 3 years ago
0
Chicago data source

#22 yychenca opened 3 years ago
2
Reach out to the voter integrity project

#21 CoderKing2020 opened 3 years ago
1
Understanding the plot

#20 krist-jin opened 3 years ago
9
Some more ideas based on infamous examples from other countries

#19 blajer opened 3 years ago
8
Florida is benford law

#18 korentzari opened 3 years ago
3
Milwaukee ward sizes are small and there is a highly preferred candidate

#17 frycast opened 3 years ago
83
Paper suggests that even second-digit analysis cannot be used

#16 ghost opened 3 years ago
1
Does anybody have a dataset known to be fraudulent?

#15 dshield55 opened 3 years ago
5
Data availability

#14 aham41 opened 3 years ago
2
For numbers summed to 100%, there can be no such thing that only one member doesn't follow Benford's rule.

#13 szabolcsvelkei opened 3 years ago
17
According to my research second-digit tests are more reliable for detecting election fraud

#12 draeder opened 3 years ago
12
Research suggests Benford is unreliable in Election Fraud Detection

#11 mlamias opened 3 years ago
9
Analyzing the second leading digit makes all the results look non-conforming

#10 dogweather opened 3 years ago
3
Looking at vote counts instead of first digits shows why this is not evidence of fraud

#9 MechanicalTim opened 3 years ago
26
What is the typical variance for applications of Benford's law?

#8 CollinQuiason opened 3 years ago
0
Plans for expansion?

#7 JacobRPrice opened 3 years ago
3
Analyze same data with different base values

#6 zigster64 opened 3 years ago
2
Failure to take account for external factors

#5 sfxworks opened 3 years ago
9
Code to mass process the data

#4 FraudAnalysis opened 3 years ago
1
2016 and 2012 comparisons

#3 tomose opened 3 years ago
4
Registered voters & number of ballots

#2 andrew2915 opened 3 years ago
0