ietf-wg-ccwg rfc5033bis issues

ietf-wg-ccwg / rfc5033bis

IETF drafts

Other

4 stars 6 forks source link

issues

Newest

Newest Most commented Recently updated Oldest Least commented Least recently updated

Update draft-ietf-ccwg-rfc5033bis.md

#135 gorryfair closed 5 days ago
0
Change subsection level

#134 martinduke closed 2 weeks ago
0
ARTART comments

#133 martinduke closed 2 weeks ago
1
OPSDIR Review

#132 martinduke closed 2 weeks ago
1
ARTART review

#131 martinduke closed 2 weeks ago
0
A final piece of text on "how" to do this

#130 gorryfair closed 1 month ago
2
RFC8836

#129 martinduke closed 1 month ago
0
Rename general-purpose transports to general-purpose congestion control

#128 martinduke closed 1 month ago
0
Switch sections 2 and 3

#127 martinduke closed 1 month ago
0
Unclarity about the evaluation environment

#126 zaheduzzaman closed 1 month ago
6
Congestion control requirements for real-time traffic

#125 zaheduzzaman closed 1 month ago
0
General-purpose transport or standard congestion control algorithm

#124 zaheduzzaman closed 1 month ago
2
Swap the placement of section 3 with section 2

#123 zaheduzzaman closed 1 month ago
0
Minor update to fix NiTs from Shepherd Review

#122 gorryfair closed 2 months ago
1
A complete review.

#121 gorryfair closed 3 months ago
0
Delete redundant discussion of circuit breakers

#120 martinduke closed 3 months ago
3
Full editorial pass for typos, line breaks, redundant text

#119 martinduke closed 3 months ago
2
some proposed edits to doc status

#118 boucadair closed 3 months ago
0
minor edits to the Introduction

#117 boucadair closed 3 months ago
0
PR to update concurrent multipath

#116 gorryfair closed 3 months ago
0
Editorial review

#115 gorryfair closed 3 months ago
0
Avoid assuming "protocol police"

#114 gorryfair closed 3 months ago
0
Restore end of PR #57

#113 gorryfair closed 3 months ago
0
Mention RFC6356?

#112 ekinnear closed 3 months ago
0
Mention circuit breakers?

#111 ekinnear closed 3 months ago
0
Indicate that a lack of DSCP is more common than we imply

#110 ekinnear closed 3 months ago
0
"Forbidden" in Section 2

#109 ekinnear closed 3 months ago
2
"previously defined algorithms" -> "previous standards-track algorith…

#108 nealcardwell closed 3 months ago
1
update "Protection Against Bufferbloat"

#107 nealcardwell closed 3 months ago
0
add requirement to not ignore high losses.

#106 huitema closed 3 months ago
2
DC and Controlled Environments

#105 gorryfair closed 3 months ago
0
Add a couple of paras of context for IETF DC work?

#104 gorryfair closed 3 months ago
0
Greg White review

#103 martinduke closed 4 months ago
0
Datacenter

#102 martinduke closed 4 months ago
3
there should be a "Protection Against High Packet Loss" subsection of "Single Algorithm Behavior"

#101 nealcardwell closed 3 months ago
9
Section 5 editorial comments

#100 gwhiteCL closed 4 months ago
1
Oscillations in over-utilization and under-utilization cycle can be added under the evaluation criteria

#99 altanai closed 3 months ago
4
Data centers with really small RTTs should be discussed as a special case

#98 ekinnear closed 4 months ago
2
Mention that CCs should not impair the path for others

#97 ekinnear closed 3 months ago
6
Review inserted on behalf of M Welzl

#96 gorryfair closed 3 months ago
2
Fix word error from recent PR

#95 martinduke closed 4 months ago
0
PR based on MW review 2

#94 gorryfair closed 3 months ago
0
PR to fix issues after WGLC (MW)

#93 gorryfair closed 4 months ago
2
Something very odd about section 3.1.4 (technical github problem?)

#92 mwelzl closed 3 months ago
2
Rewrite part of intro paragraph for Mixed Algorithms

#91 huitema closed 5 months ago
0
Delete unused reference

#90 martinduke closed 5 months ago
0
Move bottleneck

#89 martinduke closed 5 months ago
0
Delete redundant section

#88 martinduke closed 5 months ago
7
Add motivation for specifying congestion control algorithms

#87 renghardt closed 5 months ago
1
Flows sharing a bottleneck under Single Algorithm Behavior?

#86 renghardt closed 5 months ago
4