issues
search
ietf-wg-ccwg
/
rfc5033bis
IETF drafts
Other
4
stars
6
forks
source link
issues
Newest
Newest
Most commented
Recently updated
Oldest
Least commented
Least recently updated
Eric V review
#141
martinduke
closed
2 months ago
0
Orie's comments
#140
martinduke
closed
2 months ago
0
Gunter
#139
martinduke
closed
2 months ago
0
Erik Kline comment
#138
martinduke
closed
2 months ago
0
Roman DISCUSS
#137
martinduke
closed
2 months ago
0
Attempt to address comments from Warren Kumari
#136
gorryfair
closed
2 months ago
1
Update draft-ietf-ccwg-rfc5033bis.md
#135
gorryfair
closed
3 months ago
0
Change subsection level
#134
martinduke
closed
3 months ago
0
ARTART comments
#133
martinduke
closed
3 months ago
1
OPSDIR Review
#132
martinduke
closed
3 months ago
1
ARTART review
#131
martinduke
closed
3 months ago
0
A final piece of text on "how" to do this
#130
gorryfair
closed
4 months ago
2
RFC8836
#129
martinduke
closed
5 months ago
0
Rename general-purpose transports to general-purpose congestion control
#128
martinduke
closed
5 months ago
0
Switch sections 2 and 3
#127
martinduke
closed
5 months ago
0
Unclarity about the evaluation environment
#126
zaheduzzaman
closed
4 months ago
6
Congestion control requirements for real-time traffic
#125
zaheduzzaman
closed
5 months ago
0
General-purpose transport or standard congestion control algorithm
#124
zaheduzzaman
closed
5 months ago
2
Swap the placement of section 3 with section 2
#123
zaheduzzaman
closed
5 months ago
0
Minor update to fix NiTs from Shepherd Review
#122
gorryfair
closed
6 months ago
1
A complete review.
#121
gorryfair
closed
6 months ago
0
Delete redundant discussion of circuit breakers
#120
martinduke
closed
6 months ago
3
Full editorial pass for typos, line breaks, redundant text
#119
martinduke
closed
6 months ago
2
some proposed edits to doc status
#118
boucadair
closed
6 months ago
0
minor edits to the Introduction
#117
boucadair
closed
6 months ago
0
PR to update concurrent multipath
#116
gorryfair
closed
6 months ago
0
Editorial review
#115
gorryfair
closed
6 months ago
0
Avoid assuming "protocol police"
#114
gorryfair
closed
6 months ago
0
Restore end of PR #57
#113
gorryfair
closed
6 months ago
0
Mention RFC6356?
#112
ekinnear
closed
6 months ago
0
Mention circuit breakers?
#111
ekinnear
closed
6 months ago
0
Indicate that a lack of DSCP is more common than we imply
#110
ekinnear
closed
6 months ago
0
"Forbidden" in Section 2
#109
ekinnear
closed
6 months ago
2
"previously defined algorithms" -> "previous standards-track algorith…
#108
nealcardwell
closed
7 months ago
1
update "Protection Against Bufferbloat"
#107
nealcardwell
closed
7 months ago
0
add requirement to not ignore high losses.
#106
huitema
closed
7 months ago
2
DC and Controlled Environments
#105
gorryfair
closed
7 months ago
0
Add a couple of paras of context for IETF DC work?
#104
gorryfair
closed
7 months ago
0
Greg White review
#103
martinduke
closed
7 months ago
0
Datacenter
#102
martinduke
closed
7 months ago
3
there should be a "Protection Against High Packet Loss" subsection of "Single Algorithm Behavior"
#101
nealcardwell
closed
6 months ago
9
Section 5 editorial comments
#100
gwhiteCL
closed
7 months ago
1
Oscillations in over-utilization and under-utilization cycle can be added under the evaluation criteria
#99
altanai
closed
7 months ago
4
Data centers with really small RTTs should be discussed as a special case
#98
ekinnear
closed
7 months ago
2
Mention that CCs should not impair the path for others
#97
ekinnear
closed
6 months ago
6
Review inserted on behalf of M Welzl
#96
gorryfair
closed
7 months ago
2
Fix word error from recent PR
#95
martinduke
closed
7 months ago
0
PR based on MW review 2
#94
gorryfair
closed
7 months ago
0
PR to fix issues after WGLC (MW)
#93
gorryfair
closed
7 months ago
2
Something very odd about section 3.1.4 (technical github problem?)
#92
mwelzl
closed
7 months ago
2
Next