oicr-gsi robust-paper issues

oicr-gsi / robust-paper

Ten Simple Rules for Making Research Software More Robust. Manuscript is published at PLoS Computational Biology. Feedback is welcome!

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005412

MIT License

12 stars 0 forks source link

issues

Newest

Newest Most commented Recently updated Oldest Least commented Least recently updated

Copyedit requests by PLOS

#55 morgantaschuk closed 7 years ago
5
Update reference #21 to published paper

#54 morgantaschuk opened 7 years ago
2
Highlighting and reviewer letter

#53 morgantaschuk closed 7 years ago
0
Added example set to rule 9, some other tweaks to grammar and flow.

#52 morgantaschuk closed 7 years ago
1
Filling in discussion of version control a bit

#51 gvwilson closed 7 years ago
0
Shrink documentation rule

#50 morgantaschuk closed 7 years ago
2
Brief description of version control

#49 gvwilson closed 7 years ago
0
Update rule numbers and references, and make space for new rule about version control

#48 gvwilson closed 7 years ago
0
Pass 2 reviewer changes

#47 morgantaschuk closed 7 years ago
0
Fix the robust-checklist

#46 morgantaschuk closed 7 years ago
1
Consider whether to make version control/software engineering a full rule

#45 morgantaschuk closed 7 years ago
1
Redo all "see rule X" references

#44 morgantaschuk closed 7 years ago
0
Clarifying use of package managers

#43 gvwilson closed 7 years ago
0
Reorganizing "print usage" and "configurability".

#42 gvwilson closed 7 years ago
0
Clarifying our meaning of robust

#41 gvwilson closed 7 years ago
0
Adding pre-emptive note about version control

#40 gvwilson closed 7 years ago
0
Explain why config files don't satisfy rule 8

#39 gvwilson closed 7 years ago
0
Combine all mentions of documentation

#38 gvwilson closed 7 years ago
1
Remove native functions from rule 4

#37 gvwilson closed 7 years ago
1
Strengthen rule 5's advice on automation

#36 gvwilson closed 7 years ago
0
Split rule 8

#35 gvwilson closed 7 years ago
0
Remove mention of inter-institutional collaboration?

#34 gvwilson closed 7 years ago
1
Explain why authentication is mentioned in "what we left out"

#33 gvwilson closed 7 years ago
1
Explain why we're *not* asking for a suite of unit tests

#32 gvwilson closed 7 years ago
0
Clarify advice on reusing external programs

#31 gvwilson closed 7 years ago
2
Explain why "print usage" and "configure from command line" aren't combined

#30 gvwilson closed 7 years ago
0
A larger nod toward reproducibility

#29 gvwilson closed 7 years ago
2
Good programming practices

#28 gvwilson closed 7 years ago
0
Say something about version control and maintainability

#27 gvwilson closed 7 years ago
0
A "striking image" to accompany the paper

#26 gvwilson opened 7 years ago
1
Create manuscript with changes highlighted

#25 gvwilson closed 7 years ago
2
Create detailed list of responses to reviewers

#24 gvwilson closed 7 years ago
2
PLoS Computational Biology Reviews

#23 morgantaschuk closed 7 years ago
1
Final (?!) edits

#22 morgantaschuk closed 7 years ago
1
Itemizing feedback

#21 gvwilson closed 7 years ago
5
Please leave feedback here

#20 gvwilson closed 7 years ago
9
Command-line parameters vs configuration files

#19 aurelg closed 7 years ago
1
Re-wrote introduction and added references

#18 morgantaschuk closed 7 years ago
1
Filling in prior to asking for feedback.

#17 gvwilson closed 7 years ago
2
Biological Data Science abstract

#16 morgantaschuk closed 7 years ago
2
Reorganizing the rules.

#15 gvwilson closed 7 years ago
0
Second draft

#14 morgantaschuk closed 7 years ago
3
Converting to LaTeX

#13 gvwilson closed 7 years ago
3
Rule8

#12 morgantaschuk closed 7 years ago
0
rule 6

#11 morgantaschuk closed 7 years ago
0
Rule 10

#10 morgantaschuk closed 7 years ago
0
Texting up rule 4 and being relatively nice to config files

#9 morgantaschuk closed 7 years ago
1
Shortening introduction significantly

#8 gvwilson closed 7 years ago
2
Filling in ninth rule

#7 gvwilson closed 7 years ago
0
Rule 9

#6 gvwilson closed 7 years ago
2