issues
search
oicr-gsi
/
robust-paper
Ten Simple Rules for Making Research Software More Robust. Manuscript is published at PLoS Computational Biology. Feedback is welcome!
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005412
MIT License
12
stars
0
forks
source link
issues
Newest
Newest
Most commented
Recently updated
Oldest
Least commented
Least recently updated
Copyedit requests by PLOS
#55
morgantaschuk
closed
7 years ago
5
Update reference #21 to published paper
#54
morgantaschuk
opened
7 years ago
2
Highlighting and reviewer letter
#53
morgantaschuk
closed
7 years ago
0
Added example set to rule 9, some other tweaks to grammar and flow.
#52
morgantaschuk
closed
7 years ago
1
Filling in discussion of version control a bit
#51
gvwilson
closed
7 years ago
0
Shrink documentation rule
#50
morgantaschuk
closed
7 years ago
2
Brief description of version control
#49
gvwilson
closed
7 years ago
0
Update rule numbers and references, and make space for new rule about version control
#48
gvwilson
closed
7 years ago
0
Pass 2 reviewer changes
#47
morgantaschuk
closed
7 years ago
0
Fix the robust-checklist
#46
morgantaschuk
closed
7 years ago
1
Consider whether to make version control/software engineering a full rule
#45
morgantaschuk
closed
7 years ago
1
Redo all "see rule X" references
#44
morgantaschuk
closed
7 years ago
0
Clarifying use of package managers
#43
gvwilson
closed
7 years ago
0
Reorganizing "print usage" and "configurability".
#42
gvwilson
closed
7 years ago
0
Clarifying our meaning of robust
#41
gvwilson
closed
7 years ago
0
Adding pre-emptive note about version control
#40
gvwilson
closed
7 years ago
0
Explain why config files don't satisfy rule 8
#39
gvwilson
closed
7 years ago
0
Combine all mentions of documentation
#38
gvwilson
closed
7 years ago
1
Remove native functions from rule 4
#37
gvwilson
closed
7 years ago
1
Strengthen rule 5's advice on automation
#36
gvwilson
closed
7 years ago
0
Split rule 8
#35
gvwilson
closed
7 years ago
0
Remove mention of inter-institutional collaboration?
#34
gvwilson
closed
7 years ago
1
Explain why authentication is mentioned in "what we left out"
#33
gvwilson
closed
7 years ago
1
Explain why we're *not* asking for a suite of unit tests
#32
gvwilson
closed
7 years ago
0
Clarify advice on reusing external programs
#31
gvwilson
closed
7 years ago
2
Explain why "print usage" and "configure from command line" aren't combined
#30
gvwilson
closed
7 years ago
0
A larger nod toward reproducibility
#29
gvwilson
closed
7 years ago
2
Good programming practices
#28
gvwilson
closed
7 years ago
0
Say something about version control and maintainability
#27
gvwilson
closed
7 years ago
0
A "striking image" to accompany the paper
#26
gvwilson
opened
7 years ago
1
Create manuscript with changes highlighted
#25
gvwilson
closed
7 years ago
2
Create detailed list of responses to reviewers
#24
gvwilson
closed
7 years ago
2
PLoS Computational Biology Reviews
#23
morgantaschuk
closed
7 years ago
1
Final (?!) edits
#22
morgantaschuk
closed
7 years ago
1
Itemizing feedback
#21
gvwilson
closed
8 years ago
5
Please leave feedback here
#20
gvwilson
closed
7 years ago
9
Command-line parameters vs configuration files
#19
aurelg
closed
7 years ago
1
Re-wrote introduction and added references
#18
morgantaschuk
closed
8 years ago
1
Filling in prior to asking for feedback.
#17
gvwilson
closed
8 years ago
2
Biological Data Science abstract
#16
morgantaschuk
closed
8 years ago
2
Reorganizing the rules.
#15
gvwilson
closed
8 years ago
0
Second draft
#14
morgantaschuk
closed
8 years ago
3
Converting to LaTeX
#13
gvwilson
closed
8 years ago
3
Rule8
#12
morgantaschuk
closed
8 years ago
0
rule 6
#11
morgantaschuk
closed
8 years ago
0
Rule 10
#10
morgantaschuk
closed
8 years ago
0
Texting up rule 4 and being relatively nice to config files
#9
morgantaschuk
closed
8 years ago
1
Shortening introduction significantly
#8
gvwilson
closed
8 years ago
2
Filling in ninth rule
#7
gvwilson
closed
8 years ago
0
Rule 9
#6
gvwilson
closed
8 years ago
2
Next